- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
He is saying that HO was right to refuse you application because you fell short of the requirement by a very small amount.joxiri wrote:I received my rejection from AIT today, however the judge is urging me to appeal to the higher quoting him
the secretary of state has a discretion when deciding to enforce my decision in this case and further whether to require the appellant to leave the United kingdom. I encourage the secretary of state to take into account the views I have expressed in this determination that having regard to the small amount(4.28 between 1-3 september and £3.63 between 7-9 september) by which the appellant fell short of £800 figure and for quite brief periods of the shortfall this may well be such a case where discretion can properly be exercised
he goes on further to say taking these matters together appeal fails. the decision of the home office was in accordance with the law
I dont really understand the 1st part of his concluding remarks please can someone shed more light on it
thank you