- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Wanderer wrote:Yes has to be three years one of which in UK.
Remember you would be commiting an offence if you 'helped' him when in reality your marriage wasn't subsisting, I'm afraid you cannot decide who can and cannot be granted PR, it's the laws that decide.
As Wanderer said, in order for him to be able to retain his residency, you must have been married for three years and one of those, you should have lived in the UK.strawberry wrote:Wanderer wrote:Yes has to be three years one of which in UK.
Remember you would be commiting an offence if you 'helped' him when in reality your marriage wasn't subsisting, I'm afraid you cannot decide who can and cannot be granted PR, it's the laws that decide.
Wanderer, Thank you for your reply.
I am aware and responsible for my actions.
At the same time you should not be judging my situation and stating that I married him just to help him and if my marriage is real or not.
Being judged is the last thing I need out of this forum
Look, guys, as I posted earlier, i only asked for a straight forward reply .Pakhtoon wrote:As Wanderer said, in order for him to be able to retain his residency, you must have been married for three years and one of those, you should have lived in the UK.strawberry wrote:Wanderer wrote:Yes has to be three years one of which in UK.
Remember you would be commiting an offence if you 'helped' him when in reality your marriage wasn't subsisting, I'm afraid you cannot decide who can and cannot be granted PR, it's the laws that decide.
Wanderer, Thank you for your reply.
I am aware and responsible for my actions.
At the same time you should not be judging my situation and stating that I married him just to help him and if my marriage is real or not.
Being judged is the last thing I need out of this forum
Besides, he derives his right to live and work in the UK from your exercising treaty rights in the UK ( and of course marriage ). If you leave UK, he looses that right.
But yes, since you want to stay married just to help him with his immigration status, you will be committing a crime. Sure you don't want to be judged but asking for help in committing a crime is also against the T&Cs of this forum.
I have been put on thin ice too. guess for what? for saying something which is correct and sound by rules and guidance, and arguing with someone who was misleading and ignoring current rules/guidance.Pakhtoon wrote:HahaWanderer wrote:Don't know why I bother!
You have been put on "thin ice" for using derogatory remarks and inappropriate language, and not for voicing your "honest" opinions even though you may wish to believe otherwise.mrlookforward wrote:I have been put on thin ice too. guess for what? for saying something which is correct and sound by rules and guidance, and arguing with someone who was misleading and ignoring current rules/guidance.Pakhtoon wrote:HahaWanderer wrote:Don't know why I bother!
the mod says everyone has right to their opinion. What I say is, this is not a gossip forum, and why should I keep silent when somene gives misleading and wrong advice, and sounds as if they are giving right advice.
Sorry, you can ban me from here if you want to. But if someone on here repeatedly fails to understand a simple written statement and then argues abt it, then I am sorry, i will have to say that they are dumb.sushdmehta wrote:You have been put on "thin ice" for using derogatory remarks and inappropriate language, and not for voicing your "honest" opinions even though you may wish to believe otherwise.mrlookforward wrote:I have been put on thin ice too. guess for what? for saying something which is correct and sound by rules and guidance, and arguing with someone who was misleading and ignoring current rules/guidance.Pakhtoon wrote:HahaWanderer wrote:Don't know why I bother!
the mod says everyone has right to their opinion. What I say is, this is not a gossip forum, and why should I keep silent when somene gives misleading and wrong advice, and sounds as if they are giving right advice.
Nobody here stops you from correcting a wrong suggestion / inaccurate advice, but this doesn't mean that you use the opportunity to insult the other member(s).
regards
Wise advice, I think.Plum70 wrote:If you are "going through a rough patch", like every marriage does, perhaps you both should continue working towards the sustainability of your marriage? Anyone who goes into a genuine marriage knows not to take separation or divorce lightly. I do not doubt that you are one of such and hope things resolve themselves as should.
As other posters have pointed out; not in judgement but in fact - assisting your husband in attaining PR where your marriage is no longer subsisting is simply unlawful.
Well, I think you would have to look at this from a wider angle. Such a case could possibly be interpreted as a marriage of convenience. Whether that's legally really possible or not I can't tell but in practice it would probably be just very difficult to proof.Kitty wrote:However, are the requirements for the status of a marriage under the EEA Regs the same as those under the Immigration Rules? The Regulations only refer to the requirement to have been married for at least 3 years before "the initiation of termination proceedings" (i.e. divorce). They don't actually mention things like trial separation or marital breakdown where there is no divorce. The phrase "subsisting" doesn't arise, and there is no mention of "living together": commencement of divorce proceedings seems to be the only deadline.
Mmmm, yes. Good point, and one the OP's husband will need to consider.86ti wrote: Well, I think you would have to look at this from a wider angle. Such a case could possibly be interpreted as a marriage of convenience. Whether that's legally really possible or not I can't tell but in practice it would probably be just very difficult to proof.
Very simple. You enter into a genuine marriage but then you realise you don't want it anymore but want to keep it till your immigration is sorted out. Genuine goes sham.Kitty wrote:
Can a genuine marriage become one "of convenience"? A thought, but not something I know about!