- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
I will be in better position to advise if you could post the exact wording of the refusal letter here.....ays2424 wrote:Hello evrybody,
one of my friend applied for tier 1 general (initial applicant) in February 2010 and get refusal in March based on below:
She is a company employee and getting paid in cash. she was claiming the 10 months period from april 2009 to february 2010. She rang the home office to get an advice on the acceptable forms of evidence of earnings and the home office advisor said that 'accountant letter confirming the gross earnings for the the relevant period would be accaptable as an evidence of earnings. As the application made before the tax year ends, there was no tax document available to prove the earnings, so she provided payslips & accountant letter as two different evidence of earnings.
visa was refused because they state that 'accountant letter is not acceptable to prove the earnings'. but also p60 was not available. she appealed on the basis of 'discreation' and the appeal is in july. now she got p60 as well. what additional documents can she prepare before the appeal date and what do you think her chances to win the case?
thank you in advance
It is not up to the case worked to calculate anything, the applicant must prove everything. It is always up the applicant to prove their case, not the caseworkers.ays2424 wrote:here is the exact wording from the refusal letter:
'You provided 10 months payslips and a letter from a frim of accountants as evidence for your salaried earnings. Furthermore, the letter does not actually confirm your gross earnings for the relevant period and so would have not been sufficient to corroborate your claimed earnings even if could have been accepted. (accountant letter was confirming monthly and annual salary, not indicating 10 months, however monthy salary x 10 could be calculated easily bythe case worker)
thanks
You should be alright in appeal. Now you have two evidence from two separate sources.apatel23 wrote:Hi,
I am sorry to say but i am confuse now. As i explained, i got refusal due to same source of evidence. I worked in one shop last year and she paid me in cash and when i applied for extention. i submitted my Payslips and P-45. According to ECO it is same source of evidence.
But after that i managed to collect P-14 , P-60 form and HMRC letter which explain how much i paid last year tax and how much i earned? It included all cash payment details as well.
And i am not working at that place. So, do you think it is enough documents or do you have any other suggestion for me.? Please suggest me. I have to sort it our my visa.
Best up luck for your firday.
let me know your responce.
regards
ays2424 wrote:dear apatel,
whether you work or not at the moment is not important, because your appeal will be based on the period that you applied. whatever the law at the time when you applied, it applies to you.the most important thing is that were you meeting the immigration requirements when you applied??that is what you need to clarify at the tribunal. make sure your solicitor got the tier 1 guidance notes that was relevant for the time of your application. it will help the judge if you include it with the boudle.
they consider p60,p45 and employer letter as same source of evidence, but the hmrc letter will be your second source and if they all show the same figures you should be fine.
i will let you know on friday, hopefully will have good news!!