Post
by rkrishna » Fri May 21, 2010 9:14 pm
On the PBS Dependent application form (Version 04/10), I have a question about Section 2, Part F, "Identity Card for Foreign Nationals". I don't know whether to fill out this section, or whether to skip it.
I am a Tier 2 (General) migrant worker with a vignette (sticker) in my passport indicating that my visa is valid from Sept. 2009 - Sept. 2011. Thus, I have no ICFN. My dependent son was born Nov. 2009 in the UK (one month after I arrived). I am applying for a visa for him, for the first time, and I am wondering whether he needs an ICFN.
In Part F of the PBS Dependent form, the wording at the top of p. 24 is confusing.
The first paragraph indicates that I should NOT go to question F1, because I have NOT been issued an ICFN: "All dependents of Tier 2 (General)...migrants where the main applicant has been issued with an ICFN go to F1." (I have not been issued with an ICFN; instead, I have a vignette in my passport, which is the old method, now being phased out.)
However, the second paragraph of p. 24 reads: "It is mandatory to complete section F if the person is a dependent of Tier 2 (General)...if it is not complete, the application will be invalid and will be returned to the dependent."
Seeking to clarify this matter, I turned to the document "Jan 2010 ICFN Category Table", a.k.a. categorytableforidentitycards, which outlines who needs an identity card:
"DEPENDENTS -- Dependants of the above categories where applicable under the immigration rules, applying at same time (from 31 March 2009)."
"Note: ... remain unaffected by the changes, as do applicants in other immigration categories who continue to receive a vignette in their passport."
My dependent son is NOT applying at the same time as me (I am not applying right now, only he is), and I have a vignette in my passport. This leads me to guess that my dependent son does NOT need an ICFN. Have I understood this matter correctly?
However, the strong wording in paragraph 2 of p. 24 makes me wonder whether I should fill out Section F anyway, just in case, but leave a note stating that I don't think my dependent son needs an ICFN. Is this a good idea? Or how should I proceed?
Thanks very much for any advice.