- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Sky_High wrote:Most important is what are solicitor/barrester's views?
I am sure for all WP holders its great news. WP holders must win this case to realize HO that WP holders are also important immigrants like HSMP holders. Another important thing is that immigration minster is using last WP JR as strongest argument in debates to implement new laws Restrospectively. So HO must lose this case
Do you know when they are planning to file the case? A lot of affected people have already completed the 5 year mile stone.
... it will be wrong to just say that, what you need to consider first is what HSMP policy says for people at various stages they actually applied and what WP policy say. HSMP won their JRs base on those policy and not just on assumptions and emotions. Court will only consider how HO has behaved and if they've worked around the policy that is in place for WP and if there has been any bridge of such. As much as I agree with this fight against injustice, I will strongly advice that you seek advice from solicitors an study critically what WP policy says and how best to tackle HO using those policy for any loop hopes. So don't just base your fight on moral injustice or how HSMP won their own JRs.9588 wrote:if HSMP won their case against the HO , i don't see any reason why WP holders cannot.
Sleeping stage mate!1273 wrote:I would like to know if Judicial Review has started. If so what stage is it at?
Why did they exclude you? Is it not when you got entry clearance rather than entered the country? I think if they win the case you will have the same right to apply after 4 years.AntCoe wrote:Its a shame that they didnt include those that were given 4 year visas in general.
They are only fighting for those that were given 4 year visas AND entered the uk before April 2006.
those that were given 4 year visas prior to april 2006 BUT only entered after April 2006 are forgotten souls.
my 4 year visa was approved in March 2006 but i only entered in May 2006.....so sad....i would have loved to contribute some money to the course!!!
anybody out there with the same story?? i had the same legitimate expectation as those who entered before April 2006. ie. to qualify for ILR in May 2010
That means they intend to file and serve grounds of renewal. The case will then have an oral permission hearing at the RCJ.AntCoe wrote:
26 October 2010 : Court Reply
I am afraid as speculated by our legal team in advance the permission is refused i.e. we dont have enought grounds to get permission to lodge the JR. Now our team have 7 days to appeal to pick this case up.