- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
My erstwhile poster is correct - a 27 yo is an adult and unlikely to be considered a dependant even under liberal EEA law.tracy56 wrote:really , o.k, but i dont think ur advice is true , cos i consult with lawyers and home office websites. thanks for ur wrong adice anyway
ermmm, how do you know that my advice is wrong? And if you already have the right advice from solicitor, then why are you wasting your time? By the way, this forum is not for comprehensive legal advice. Here people share knowledge and their opinions are only generic. Comprehensive advice should be sought by meeting an oisc registered advisor or a solicitor, who will give his opinion and any possible way forward by looking carefully at all the evidence available on a particular case.tracy56 wrote:really , o.k, but i dont think ur advice is true , cos i consult with lawyers and home office websites. thanks for ur wrong adice anyway
The reason is, much as I respect Obie's opinions, he has a more rose-tinted outlook, whereas us seasoned posters mostly are more cynical and jaded and align with the ECO tenet - 'on the balance of probabilities...'tracy56 wrote:thanks OBIE for your advice , i wonder y others have been harsh and giving me wrong informations,
What has age got to do with dependency? I would suggest we base our posts and answers on facts rather than attitudes. Problem is, that members answers are based on limited UK boarder website.Wanderer wrote:The reason is, much as I respect Obie's opinions, he has a more rose-tinted outlook, whereas us seasoned posters mostly are more cynical and jaded and align with the ECO tenet - 'on the balance of probabilities...'tracy56 wrote:thanks OBIE for your advice , i wonder y others have been harsh and giving me wrong informations,
And 'on the balance of probabilities' I say a 27 yo dependent is let's say certainly gonna struggle to prove genuine dependency.
Tracy56 my advise to you is that you should study the directive as much as you can. Don't just read it, study it , put together all the proof you have before you even approach any solicitor. study the board as much as you can as well. Put much emphasis on what failed others so that you don't fall in the same trap.tracy56 wrote:really , o.k, but i don't think ur advice is true , cos i consult with lawyers and home office websites. thanks for ur wrong adice anyway
Groan.... On the balance of probabilities I said....DFDS. wrote:What has age got to do with dependency? I would suggest we base our posts and answers on facts rather than attitudes. Problem is, that members answers are based on limited UK boarder website.Wanderer wrote:The reason is, much as I respect Obie's opinions, he has a more rose-tinted outlook, whereas us seasoned posters mostly are more cynical and jaded and align with the ECO tenet - 'on the balance of probabilities...'tracy56 wrote:thanks OBIE for your advice , i wonder y others have been harsh and giving me wrong informations,
And 'on the balance of probabilities' I say a 27 yo dependent is let's say certainly gonna struggle to prove genuine dependency.
There is no age limit in the directive on who qualifies for member of house or dependency. All you have to do is to produce proof of the latter!