- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
If you cannot find this out, then you cannot prove that BHC's verification report is inaccurate. And if you can't prove that, there is no way you can think of getting the ban overturned.gv1kram wrote:I will check with my HR team but am not sure, upto how much extend our HR team wil be helpful in this. Also the concerned HR person is not sure who had responded to the BHC representative not sure who will be the responsible forour eployer person responding the BHC rep.
That's a big assumption, and definitely not the case! Otherwise, no applicant from India would have his/her Tier 1 application approved. The problem is with your bank, no matter what you may say!gv1kram wrote:there is no logo on the statement. which is a most general case, as most of the banks wont give the bank statement on paper with Bank logo.
Why? It is not the authenticity that is being questioned here, but the fact that the bank statements do not even meet the requirements as specified in the policy guidance (e.g.- logo). Checking the authenticity of the statement comes second .. first fulfil the stated requirements.layman wrote:but shouldn't the caseworker do a verification for the authenticity of the provided bank statement(stamped & signed) before rejecting it?
Well, then the requirements and the way they are interpreted should be consistent. I had submitted because of a known case where such a 'stamped & signed' statement(from the same bank) was accepted and a visa was granted. But I understand that this cannot be quoted as a precedence and the risk of rejection lies entirely with mesushdmehta wrote:It is not the authenticity that is being questioned here, but the fact that the bank statements do not even meet the requirements as specified in the policy guidance (e.g.- logo). Checking the authenticity of the statement comes second .. first fulfil the stated requirements.
regards
Interpretation depends on the applicant's ability to comprehend what is stated in the policy. You can neither blame UKBA for it nor can you expect consistency (in interpretation). As for consistency in requirements, UKBA has published only one Tier 1(General) policy guidance for all applicants across the world.layman wrote: then the requirements and the way they are interpreted should be consistent.
If law permits you to file adminstrative review along with addtional documents that is fine. If not then you just have to rely on written statements (grounds of review). And with that you wont stand much of chance. And if the review gets refuse the graph of your cradibility will go little further down.gv1kram wrote:Hello All..
Thanks for your quick response..
I have checked with my HR team but she is not sure who has provided the incorrect information to BHC rep. However, she is ready to give me a letter on company letter head, stating that the Payslip details I have mentioned are correct.
Please let me know if this letter can pull me out of this problem (320(7a)).
Thanks,
Vikram
Hi ,rizwan567 wrote:The suggestion I gave is on the basis of a case which I have personally seen.. that applicant was also accused of deception but that application was made within the UK. Case was reapplied and subsequently approved.
Apart from (risk of) loosing application fee I think there is no harm in re-applying but the reward could be great... and applicant has no other option... If I were applicant, I would definately reapply
I am not blaming UKBA for applicants (in)ability to interpret. Read carefully, I have mentioned that I personally know(not hearsay) of a case where the stamped and signed bank statements on dot matrix printer were accepted as valid earnings evidence and the Tier 1 visa was granted. So what I am expecting is consistency in interpretation of guidance policy by the caseworkers, not the applicants.sushdmehta wrote:Interpretation depends on the applicant's ability to comprehend what is stated in the policy. You can neither blame UKBA for it nor can you expect consistency (in interpretation). As for consistency in requirements, UKBA has published only one Tier 1(General) policy guidance for all applicants across the world.
regards
Hi NSVnsv wrote:Hi Vikram,
I had my wife's dependent visa rejected for reason of missing bank (HSBC) logo in statements. I went to the bank and got new statements with logo. I submitted them along with the appeal application. The process took a month but the application was approved.
I am not sure about the ban procedure and its implications... but thought it might be useful.
Regards,
Hi , Your case is not the same as NSV ... the word overlooked is a big one for ECO so can you write here what exactly you have written in your cover letter .vagabond4life wrote:Hi NSVnsv wrote:Hi Vikram,
I had my wife's dependent visa rejected for reason of missing bank (HSBC) logo in statements. I went to the bank and got new statements with logo. I submitted them along with the appeal application. The process took a month but the application was approved.
I am not sure about the ban procedure and its implications... but thought it might be useful.
Regards,
When was your wifes visa rejected and when did you resubmit? Did you actually Appeal or went for Administrative review.
I am in the same boat. My wifes visa got rejected in May last week because ECO could not verify my latest 30 days bank balance. But the fact was that all statements were submitted but were overlooked (maybe by mistake) by the caseworker.
Can you please let me know what exactly you did for resubmission and if you paid again ?
Thanks
Her visa was rejected in Jan, rejected in Feb, appealed in Feb. It took 3-4 weeks for appeal result. Dependents only have appeal, primary applicant have Admin review which does not allow to submit any more support documents. I did not pay again as her application had right to appeal with provision for more support documents. So we went to bank, made sure that logo was present in each page of the statement and submitted it along with appeal application.vagabond4life wrote: Hi NSV
When was your wifes visa rejected and when did you resubmit? Did you actually Appeal or went for Administrative review.
I am in the same boat. My wifes visa got rejected in May last week because ECO could not verify my latest 30 days bank balance. But the fact was that all statements were submitted but were overlooked (maybe by mistake) by the caseworker.
Can you please let me know what exactly you did for resubmission and if you paid again ?
Thanks
My dear friendaliq09 wrote:Hi , Your case is not the same as NSV ... the word overlooked is a big one for ECO so can you write here what exactly you have written in your cover letter .vagabond4life wrote:Hi NSVnsv wrote:Hi Vikram,
I had my wife's dependent visa rejected for reason of missing bank (HSBC) logo in statements. I went to the bank and got new statements with logo. I submitted them along with the appeal application. The process took a month but the application was approved.
I am not sure about the ban procedure and its implications... but thought it might be useful.
Regards,
When was your wifes visa rejected and when did you resubmit? Did you actually Appeal or went for Administrative review.
I am in the same boat. My wifes visa got rejected in May last week because ECO could not verify my latest 30 days bank balance. But the fact was that all statements were submitted but were overlooked (maybe by mistake) by the caseworker.
Can you please let me know what exactly you did for resubmission and if you paid again ?
Thanks
There are 2 things , first is your statement and second is your cover letter and yes! the third one is a bank letter .. my friend one logical question .. ECO over looked all these things ...............???????