- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
I am sure some law gurus out there can challenge this law - because i dont think the approach is legal...so people will have to spend more money in Fees. charles Clarke and McNulty must be off their trolleystvt wrote:There is no direct way to appeal against this.
The only way to challenge this would be by applying for Judicial Review on administrative law grounds like Legitimate Expectations and the like.
Chris wrote:I think someone should appealing against this (unfair) law.
What comes to my mind immd. is UK immigration lawyer Gherson and Company www.gherson.com as they have already won 1 case against Home Office. But there has to be some immigrant client on whose behalf Gherson can fight for.
Chess, as I waded through this topic this evening I was indeed already thinking about making contact with an MP about this. But we should not underestimate the difficulties in getting this overturned.Chess wrote:John,
Could you please ask your MP to raise a question the House of Commons - regarding why rules are being applied retrospectively?
Oh I don't know about that I have been here almost 5yrs now, and I havent seen this hate you talk about. Your MP is a better bet I reckon, at least he can raise a question to Charles Clarke in the House of Commons, don't forget a lot of people who are affected are more than likely voters too.maxima wrote:Lets be honest. most of people of this country (and almost every country in the world) hates immigrants. so forget abt help from MP etc.. Only lawers can do the job (cos they are chicky enough).
A lie? Undoubtedly it will be interpreted as that. However I suspect that it is further proof this the relevant arm of Government have not got a clue what actually happens in the real world."..it has no impact on business" when in fact businesses will have to fork out payment for Work Permit extensions and Highly Skilled Migrants in business will have to fork out for the extension of their LTR.
-: the change they are referring to being the move from 4 years to 5 years.The change is not regarded as controversial.