Post
by Milaena » Sun Jul 04, 2010 8:40 am
"Refusal to Vary Leave or Variation of Leave: Paragraph 286 with reference to 284(i) and of HC 395 (as amended) as set out in paragraph 14 of HC 538"
"The Secretary of State is not satisfied that you have limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom which was given in accordance with any of the provisions of these Rules, other than where as a result of that leave you would not have been in the United Kingdom beyond 6 months from the date on which you were admitted to the United Kingdom on this occasion in accordance with these rules, unless the leave in question is limited to enter as a fiancee or proposed civil partner or unless the leave in question was granted to you as the spouse, civil partner, unmarried or same-sex partner of a Tier 1 Migrant and that spouse or partner is the same person in relation to whom you are applying for an extension of stay under this rule."
"You are entitled to appeal this decision under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. The appeal must be made on one or more of the following grounds:
* that the decision is not in accordance with immigration rules
* that the decision is unlawful because it racially discriminates against you
* that the decision is unlawful because it is incompatible with your rights under the European Convention on Human Rights
* that the decision breaches rights which you have as an EEA National or member of such a person's family under Community Treaties relating to entry or residence in the United Kingdom
* that the decision is otherwise not in accordance with the law
* that a discretion under the immigration rules should have been exercised differently
* that your removal from the United Kingdom as a result of the decision would: 1)breach the United Kingdom's obligations under the 1951 Refugee Convention; and 2) be incompatible with your rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
The REASONS LETTER is quite long. I can scan it. The most disturbing paragraph says:
"While it is accepted that you may have established family in the UK, it is not accepted that the decision to refuse this application gives rise to any interference with your family life. Article 8 of the ECHR does not guarantee a person or their family the right to choose to live in the UK. A decision will only lead to interference with family life when there are unreasonable expectations to family life being continued elsewhere. You have spent the majority of your life in the USA and should therefore be able to re-adjust back to life in your home country. It is noted that you are not working in the UK and you do not own property in the UK (false) and you are originally from the USA so you will have no trouble settling there again. It is open to your spouse to travel to USA with you to continue your life overseas, should this be your wish. "
I am 65 (wife) and my husband is 69. We are both under medical care. Spouse is a born in Kent UK citizen who travelled to USA for a job in 1965, we met in 1966 and married in 1972. It was always our intention to return here to live. Our children were christened here, we own a family home here under our two names, freehold, no mortgage.
It goes on a bit, I won't type more unless someone has a question. M