- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
f2k wrote:what is your current immigration status?
Providing false information might cause problems later, e.g when applying for British citizenship or even lead to ILR to be revoked so in my opinion it is not a good idea to hide.
Thanks for the advice! I am not exactly worried just about my future but my husband's and the baby's. If my situation is going to affect the ILR for my husband I don't want to spoil it, and ambetter not to be mentioned or found. Of course it would be great to get advice from a good solicitor, but seems to me that we are just paying lots of money for that and not receiving any, that's why I came to seek help in this forumkiwigirl25 wrote:Thunder,
Seek legal advice.
In these situations I would always advise speaking to an immmigration solicitor. As the other poster suggested you need to be honest. If discovered this could lead severe implications for future applications for citizenship and your ILR. Lying about your status could be deemed as a fraudulant application and fraud has severe penalities in the UK. You need legally representation.
Sorry for potentially scaring you but you need to choose between being honest and potentially resolving your situation for good; or lying which temporarily fixes the situation only to have to deal with it again it again in a few years time.
Find a good solicitor!
I'm afraid that is not entirely correct. The 14 year rule does not guarantee that the person applying under this rule will be able to stay. Their application is considered the same as anyone applying under any of the other ILR options; it can be easily rejected as it can be accepted.bbbb wrote:
Anyway after 14years he will not deported.
However, immigration history is relevant to the 14 year rule. Clearly, it would not be appropriate to refuse leave on the grounds of conduct simply because the applicant is an overstayer or illegal entrant, as that would defeat the purpose of the rule. However, the rule is not intended to reward people for their success in evading, or failing to co-operate with immigration control. Therefore, any deliberate or blatant
attempts to circumvent immigration control, e.g. by absconding, contracting a marriage of convenience or using false documents (this is not an exhaustive list), may well mean that it is not in the public interest to grant leave.
Thunderf2k wrote:Does the questionnaire / form ask for your status?
In any case I still think he needs to be honest. Being dishonest could lead to all of you being in serious trouble. I would like to believe that they do treat each case on its own merits so your husbands case should be dealt with based on what he has done not anybody else as long as he has nott been dishonest.
If he is approved then he there will be a chance for you to regularise your stay. it may very well be difficult but you will be in a much bettter place than you are now
f2k wrote:Does the questionnaire / form ask for your status?
U stated that her husband s case is not that strong, now if u add her and the baby (really young ) will her husband s case be weaker or stronger??. without ur husband's ILR . her and her baby have not cases and no statutskiwigirl25 wrote:I think you are also being naive about the 14 year asylum seeker. There have been recent cases of 14 year applicants being rejected, however they do get FLR or the right to appeal. They are not removed immediately. I lived here for 17 years and have applied for my ILR, there is still a strong chance I could get rejected and removed.
I would follow Kiwigirl25 advice on this matter as she has hands on experiencekiwigirl25 wrote:bbbb - it is about her and her family, how could you even say such a thing. If her husband is caught lying then the implications are so great for the entire family. They could be torn apart. How could you wish that on any family? UKBA will check the address for other residents, thunder might be lucky and they won't carry out further checks on her. But they will question why the husband didn't declare his dependants.
I think you are also being naive about the 14 year asylum seeker. There have been recent cases of 14 year applicants being rejected, however they do get FLR or the right to appeal. They are not removed immediately. I lived here for 17 years and have applied for my ILR, there is still a strong chance I could get rejected and removed.
Thunder - I wish you all the very best and I hope it works out in the end. Please take my recent advice about the solicitor.