ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Tier 2 refused now under 320 (7B) - Please Help!

Only for the UK Skilled Worker visas, formerly known as Tier 2 visa route

Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2

Locked
ace123
Newly Registered
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:42 pm

Tier 2 refused now under 320 (7B) - Please Help!

Post by ace123 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:10 am

Hi all,

I have refused my visa only on general grounds, point awarded as claimed, I am victim of judgement error, ECO states employer document is not true which is insane, I had been working since last 3 years for same employer, in Admin review I sent all relevant documents along my job contract, and reference letter from employer to prove that. But, ECM uphold the decision.

After 4 months I applied new application after new RLMT and CoS, I refused again for Entry Clearance under paragraph 320 (7B) this time, states that I have been refused earlier under 320 (7A).

Please give me your advice on it.

Thanks..
Last edited by ace123 on Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:35 am, edited 2 times in total.

geriatrix
Moderator
Posts: 24755
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: does it matter?
United Kingdom

Post by geriatrix » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:25 am

If you aren't in the UK, the question regarding legal status "now" is irrelevant.

Consult a competent solicitor / lawyer.


regards

The Station Agent
Senior Member
Posts: 623
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:51 am
Location: UK
United Kingdom

Post by The Station Agent » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:39 am

[quote="RFL4.2 When must I refuse under paragraph 320 (7A)?"]When you have evidence that the applicant has used deception, made a false statement or given false information (whether or not material to the application, and whether or not to the applicant's knowledge), or withheld a material fact in an application, either orally (at interview) or in writing.

The legal standard of proof is ‘to a higher balance of probabilities’, so it must be more likely than not that the falsehood has been used. It is for us to prove that an applicant has used falsehood. This means that it is not enough for us simply to doubt that the applicant is telling the truth. In order to refuse under this Rule, we need positive evidence that they have used deception or false representations, or that a document that they have submitted is false.

ECOs should also consider whether it is appropriate to refuse the applicant under paragraph 320(11) of the Immigration Rules) (see RFL7) where the applicant has “previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules.â€

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33327
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Post by vinny » Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:09 am

sushdmehta wrote:Consult a competent solicitor / lawyer.
Yes. You should challenge the 320(7A) refusal. Else, you may be banned for 10 years.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

Locked