- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
fifi2011 wrote:greenie !!To be able for him to be a self employed in the uk he need to have he's cscs card !!which he got now but didnt have before !! he is working for himself !!Now in overall he is a self employed even in france he is a property developer he buy and rent properties !!What's your problem ?i am here to ask for advice if you can't just forget it and do your thing .Someone have been working on his own for the last 10 years is a self employed it doesn't change someone's into a different career when moving to britain !! Its just you need to do the cscs card before working if you know about working in the uk in construction ..anyway thxs really appreciate it.
My take on this would be that a person who can't undertake work in their chosen field in the UK without certification (in your husband's case, the CSCS card) isn't actually "self-employed" until they have that certification.fifi2011 wrote:He is self employed but have not been working in the uk cause he had to do his cscs card to be able to work in the uk construction jobs !!
I was thinking the same but there is still this "threatening" letter from the UKBA and I wonder if an appeal is not the formally right way to go. Those letters are actually quite appalling given that the UKBA has no evidence that the applicant is unlawful in the country. Some people just make basic mistakes and do not fully understand the application process.Kitty wrote:Personally I wouldn't bother with an appeal: I would gather the relevant papers, get translations where necessary, and make a new application. EEA applications are free, after all.
Interesting point: the European Casework Guidance (Section 2 paragraph 6.4) confirms that removal cannot be effected while an in-time appeal is underway.86ti wrote: I was thinking the same but there is still this "threatening" letter from the UKBA and I wonder if an appeal is not the formally right way to go. Those letters are actually quite appalling given that the UKBA has no evidence that the applicant is unlawful in the country. Some people just make basic mistakes and do not fully understand the application process.
This is why appealing in my opinion is the best option for the OP to protect her positon and to give herself time to obtain the evidence she requires rather than risk being served with a notice of intention to remove and having to try to scamble together the evidence. Although it's unlikely they will atttempt the removal in my view appealing protects the OP's position, and gives her the best opportunity to prove her case as it UKBA do not accept or consider the further evidence she submits, it can be considered by the IJ.Kitty wrote:
Interesting point: the European Casework Guidance (Section 2 paragraph 6.4) confirms that removal cannot be effected while an in-time appeal is underway.
EEA status should also be investigated at the point of any proposed removal as well: if you can produce the relevant documents at that time then you should not be removed.
It would be interesting to see the actual wording of that letter. I would think it should mention at least that a removal can only be executed if he/she is unlawful in the UK (and another question would be if that could be done before that person has become "an unreasonable burden to the state").Kitty wrote:EEA status should also be investigated at the point of any proposed removal as well: if you can produce the relevant documents at that time then you should not be removed.