- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Your conclusion doesn't make any sense. You derive your rights from the marriage to an EEA national who is exercising treaty rights.pol wrote:Plus, I'm not sure If I'm entitled to work while the appeal is in process. I understand I would be entitled if I re apply.
As he is a dependent I don't see quite how.pol wrote:I forgot to mention that my son is getting the European nationality soon. Would that help with anything?
Entering with an EEA family permit would have made it clear from day 0 your status in the UK (and allowed you to work immediately). But it is not required for applying for a Residence Card. Your status in the UK is based solely on your relationship to your husband and that he is working in the UK.pol wrote:I entered the UK witha turist visa. I am chilean and we do not need visa to enter the UK as a visitor, so we didn't apply for the family permit. We moved by the end of the summer and we needed to move fast so we could find a school for our son.
Would that make any difference you think?
What I meant was that I don't think his (potential) Italian citizenship is particularly material to your Residence Card application.Also, my son is getting the Italian citizenship soon. I'm starting the process of naturalization on April. Should we mention this?
It is important for my case. My husband is self-employed too, and his clients are mostly from the US. What HO told you about clients oversees sounds a little bit weird. He is working in the UK. Why is it relevant where his clients are residing? Where did they pull this requirements from?pol wrote:They actually refused the application because they say my husband wasn't exercising treaty rights. He is self-employed and has a few clients overseas.
The specific reason they gave me is that we showed evidence of employment overseas and invoices issued in america dollars therefore he wasn't exercising the treaty rights.