- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
It doesn't say:"has been paid at of above ... for the period of £$%& month". So unless they set out a specific guidance about this which they haven't, base on the letter of the law, you are fine because on the day of your application, you are paid at the appropiate rate.134 (iv) his employer certifies that he is paid at or above the appropriate rate for the job as stated in the codes of practice for Tier 2 Sponsors published by the UK Border Agency, and
sushdmehta wrote:Following littlerice's interpretation, you'll need at least 1 payslip to show that you have been paid at the new rate effective 14/04/2011 as stated in the letter.
Unless the new salary has been paid, at least once, one cannot claim that "he is paid". Until then, all the letter does is that it certifies that "from XYZ date, he will be paid". The caseworker may argue that the letter may just be issued for the purpose of ILR with the employer having no intention to pay the new rate to the employee in reality.
Perhaps I am getting a bit too technical on the issue but I thought it wise to highlight something that could be a potential problem.
littlerice wrote:@waijei2
If you are paid monthly, then you'll just have to apply without the raised payslip, but I would suggest consulting a lawyer.
If you are paid bi-weekly, then you can just pospone the application until after April 29th when you get your next payslip.
It is being applied. Parliament doesn't have to explicitly approve it. It is approved by them not saying no. This is called "negative procedure" where it is considered approved unless either House objects. The full act was approved through "affirmative procedure" where both Houses must approve it. This is an adjustment to the parent act that is usually handled through "negative procedure".Why people who is applying to ILR now worrying about COP and income criteria if this is a rule that has to be approved by Parliament before start to be apply?
Am I right or this is just another unfair trick from HO?
Did you read Section 10 of the SET(O) form - in particular, 10B?Cosmos wrote:There is nothing on the SET(O) form asking for a formal document to support this.
Waijei2, can you please share your experience with this issue? how did you go along submitting your application? did you go to a PEO or applied through post?waijei2 wrote:littlerice wrote:@waijei2
If you are paid monthly, then you'll just have to apply without the raised payslip, but I would suggest consulting a lawyer.
If you are paid bi-weekly, then you can just pospone the application until after April 29th when you get your next payslip.
I get paid monthly and increased salary would be 20th May but Visa expires on 10th May. Even my solicitor isn't sure 100% if my application will be successful or not.
Thanks