ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Employment

Employers looking for workers, people looking for employers: Get connected here.

Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator

Locked
bristol1
Newly Registered
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:31 pm

Employment

Post by bristol1 » Wed May 11, 2011 12:13 am

I was employed by company for 2 years under post study work visa. Company employed for work permit. However work permit was refused because the company solicitor filled a wrong cos code.

When i received my refusal(22nd novermber) my existing work permit was elapsed(23rd october) and i was given 10 days to appeal. However instead of making an appeal i made fresh Tier1 application as an overstayer on 8th december.
My company dismissed me on 3rd december because i did not appeal and made new indepedent TIER 1 application as an overstayer.

My new application was approved in january and my company refused to take me back.

My question is- was dismissal was the only option left for the company or cud they have just suspend me until there was decision made on my new application?
[/b]

ouflak1
Senior Member
Posts: 952
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:59 pm

Re: Employment

Post by ouflak1 » Wed May 11, 2011 12:47 pm

bristol1 wrote: My question is- was dismissal was the only option left for the company or cud they have just suspend me until there was decision made on my new application?
This is just my own opinion.

The problem is that your company couldn't legally employ you, even if you are 'suspended'. They simply couldn't have you on their books. If you had gone for the appeal, atleast they would be safe from any legal ramifications. I think this probably affected why they didn't take you back either, i.e; If you are willing to put the company in that sort of position, what other questionable positions would you be willing to put them into as an employee?

As to the company's options... well sure... they had the option to keep you employed. They did not even have to suspend you. You could have just kept right on working as usual, your new application eventually approved, and life goes on. Was the company willing to take the risk that they (and you) might get caught and everybody gets slammed on down hard by the letter of the law? It sounds like they weren't willing to take that risk and perhaps it was for the best. You never know what nasty little immigration control surprises might have occurred, and that would have been the end of your Tier 1 application pretty much instantly.

My advice: Since you've got your Tier 1, take the opportunity to move on.
Last edited by ouflak1 on Thu May 12, 2011 7:56 am, edited 2 times in total.

mulderpf
Diamond Member
Posts: 1669
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:10 am
Location: London

Post by mulderpf » Wed May 11, 2011 6:30 pm

Legally they are not allowed to employ you when you are not legally allowed to work in the UK, so they acted completely within their rights.

haritagepoint
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 8:39 am

Post by haritagepoint » Thu May 12, 2011 8:48 am

As for his chances ... of course ... they had the opportunity to keep you busy. They did not even suspend you. You could have just kept right on working as usual, your new application is approved and that life goes on. The company was ready to take the risk that they (and you) can get caught and everyone slammed hard by the letter of the law? It seems as if they were not willing to take that risk, and it was perhaps for the better. You never know what nasty little surprises immigration control have occurred and would have been the end of your Level 1 requires about the same.

My advice: when you received Tier 1, the opportunity to go.

Locked