I never said that I make a lot of *money*. I said, that I am *succesfull* -- two different things... . Percentages, percentages...Idea wrote: Its strange that an intra-day trader makes lot of money wants to live on
60 quid/month. Someone might live on air, lets make the rule to suit them
Of course I want to live on £60 (or 65) per month if it gives me other great things. Have to live according to situations. As I said, I have lived many many days in the past with only £1-2 so I can do that. Easy... It also keeps your stomach tight and smaller .
If your wife and children lives in country X and you in country Y, then would you be happy to live with "only" £60/day just to be with them? I bet you would... And so would others. So this rule that "We dont let you to be with your wife/fiancee/loved-one because we dont believe that you would like to live with only £65/month if you be with him/her" sounds a bit odd to me. Why would somebody refuse to live with £65 if just can be with her/his partner? Its a matter of putting values in order.
"and talking of fakes...there are people using fake passports,so lets do away with passports ...that'll solve your problem wouldn't it ?"
I am not really speaking about law breaking things. Faking a passport is a straight criminal act. But asking your boss to pay you more salary temporary is definitely absolutely lawfull thing. There is no law which says that you cannot ask more salary. And even if was, I dont think thats a logical law.
"How kind of you to only make her pay for half the ticket !!"
We have to do the tricks to show that I have a lot of money when applying fiancee visa. So of course we both understand that its better for her to pay me some money so that my account looks as big as possible. Actually better if she pays all! then I have that £700 waiting for visa applications!
"What a Love !!"
Yes, real love uses wisdom looks in to the future and sees that this thing will propably give us the fiancee visa!
I am not against the law. But, I am against "stupid laws" in a way, that I do not follow *them* into the letter. For example a law that "you cannot in any situation copy music to another CD". I am a musician and this would make life very very difficult if I always had to buy a original CD about the songs we practise, so...
But its pretty useless to talk about these here if no Visa people are reading these. But I would like to have a meal with Visa law makers...but like in all science, I am able to see that my theories are falsifiable and if somebody can prove that I am wrong then I can change, like in all science should be.