- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
If my wife wasn't born and brought up in the UK and my children weren't settled in school here I'd leave before you could say ID Card Database. It's still a possibility and I'm working on convincing the wife that while millions of people want to come here this country is actually going down the pan and it's time we bailed. 90% (effective) tax, an ID Card Database that's a charter for identity thieves, a criminal justice system that's in meltdown (no, it won't improve under Reid), and even a sneaky database on my kids and how well or badly I'm bringing them up. And that's just the beginning."Can you not leave?"
Yeah. I'm seriously considering it. The Orwellian ID card scheme should make everybody very afraid.
Taking no salary would not be a good idea but there is absolutely no need for you to take a big salary unless you might have IR35 problems.The govt doesn't like me taking no salary and paying myself a big chunk in dividends so I HAVE to pay myself a big salary.
I don't believe it's an exaggeration. The London Congestion Charge alone can exceed the tax "savings" via the personal allowance, the 10% band and the 22% band.but let's not exaggerate here
I agree, you can't. 42.5 + 63.8 gives 106.3% which is obviously flawed. The total of those five taxes and all the others is circa 90% in real terms after allowances.you can't just add percentages together like that and get a meaningful conclusion
But the United Kingdom is not Canada. Canada is quite relaxed about the idea of its population increasing by 10-15% over the next generation, but then it has the space to accommodate this.jes2jes wrote: 1. Foreign Nationals living in the UK would fund part of this process which I think is not fair. The immigration charges currently are already exhorbitant and I see a further increase which will make it more expensive. Canada has reduced is RPRF to make their country more attractive to immigrants and we are scarring them off!
I shall also be fascinated by that explanation!EJ wrote:Could you please explain why you cannot just pay yourself dividends as a director of your company? I know the tax saving wouldn't be much as you would pay 35% tax on dividends received if you are a higher rate tax payer. I am just interested to know how the regulations force you to pay yourself a salary?
And sadly that is not just over there but here (in US) as well!!! Good luck with getting rid of illegals. That same problem is happening here in California with millions of people coming from Central America.Dawie wrote:Because I am emphasising the dearly beloved overtones of British citizens' perceptions of illegal immigration.Silly question, but why do you have to refer to them using a colour?
Not sure what you mean by "land border with mainland Europe".OL7MAX wrote: I've no idea how many nurses or policemen that "buys" but if £5 billion went to the HO they could build a 50 ft high electrified wall across the entire land border between the UK and mainland Europe.... and still have 5,000 million pounds to spare.