There is a miscarriage of justice here please help!
Where a tribunal judge ruled as seen below and still went ahead to uphold the UKBA's FLR refusal decision because of 322 (1A), what do you think? please help urgently !!!!! Thanks
“The standard to be met by the respondent is the civil standard and I am satisfied to that standard, that a false document (the old /previous passport) was submitted. I go on to find that the respondent (UKBA) has failed to prove that this document was submitted in the appellant’s knowledge. I note how she has used a/the document in the past and I further note that she could have simply not submitted her own passport when he made his latest application. In the circumstance the respondent(UKBA) has failed to prove that the appellant was not an innocent dupe of her sister who help her to get the passport .â€
- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222