ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Applications under 196D of HC395

Only for queries regarding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). Please use the EU Settlement Scheme forum for queries about settled status under Appendix EU

Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix

Locked
hermes
Newly Registered
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 12:55 pm

Applications under 196D of HC395

Post by hermes » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:48 pm

In 2010, my friend was granted ILR upon completion of 5 years work permit approved employment (under para 134 of HC395). At the time, his wife, who had not completed the KOL requirement, could not apply with him. Because his wife was not being granted ILR, his son could also not apply.

Can they apply now under 196D of the Immigration Rules or do they need to wait for 2 years before applying as spouse of a person settled in the UK?

Which form they should use and what would be the fee?

PS: Both his wife and son were granted leave to enter as dependants of work permit holder (and not in the settlement category).

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33336
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Post by vinny » Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:10 am

No need to wait (196E). Probably SET(O).
Last edited by vinny on Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

hermes
Newly Registered
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 12:55 pm

Post by hermes » Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:56 am

vinny wrote:No need to wait (196E). Probably SET(O).
Thank you Vinny.

My friend called up the enquiry bureau yesterday and was told that the grant depends upon caseworker's discretion since her husband already had ILR, she was no longer a dependant of a WP holder.

Why would a discretion apply when 196D (ii) is clear about granting ILR even when principal applicant and dependant do not apply together?

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33336
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Post by vinny » Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:24 am

I don't think that discretion is required. Do quote the applicable immigration rules when applying.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

Locked