- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
My understanding of the last two paragraphs is that I would be eligible to apply for ILR under HSMP JR rules ONLY IF I had extended my HSMP under the JR rules back in 2008. Which I didn't. I just transferred to Tier-1 since my leave was about to run to.Consideration of applications covered by the High Court ruling of April 2008
In addition to those covered by the second judgment (detailed above) there is a separate group who applied
to enter the HSMP between the change in the ILR Rules in April 2006 and the change in the HSMP
extension criteria in November 2006.
Applicants who fall into this category (and are not included in the second judgment) will still be required to
meet the continuous leave requirement as specified in the Immigration Rules (currently 5 years). However,
due to the fact that some of this cohort may have spent time not covered by HSMP leave as a direct result of
the changes to the extension Rules, the following factors should be considered when calculating continuous
residence for this group.
• any valid leave obtained prior to the judgment;
• Tier 1 (General) leave issued under the terms of the HSMP Forum Ltd Judicial Review Policy
document;
• the time between the end of the applicant's HSMP leave and the start of the Tier 1 (General) leave
issued under the terms of the policy document;
• any valid subsequent leave
Caseworkers will be able to identify those applicants who have been granted Tier 1 (General) leave under
the terms of this policy document by reference to the title of the case type on CID and from the associated
case comments. The case type prefix will be Tier 1 (Gateway), for those granted further leave in the UK.
Those approved further leave at post overseas under the terms of this policy document can be identified by
reference to the case comments on CRS (International Group's database of visa applications). In addition,
applicants affected by the judgment have been advised to submit their approval letter issued in light of the
High Court judgment with any subsequent application for settlement.
A migrant who does not have current leave as a highly skilled worker will not qualify for ILR as a highly skilled
worker and must first successfully apply to be re-instated as a highly skilled worker before they can apply for
ILR from that category. Migrants who gain re-instatement under these provisions and, as a result, complete
the qualifying period for applying for ILR, will then need to make a separate application for ILR as a Tier 1
(General) Migrant.
polar wrote:Ask your employer to write a letter stating that they misspell the name before and both name are refering to you.
My friend got the same problem before the company change the name on the pay slip. She got her ILR with the letter from the employer saying both are the same person. It would be alright.
kunald wrote:IMO, it doesn't matter. In all probability you will have your NI number in the payslip. It is better not to mention anything to the caseworker. If the spelling mistake gets picked up show your NI card (and letter) to show that it is a spelling mistake only. As backup, you may want to carry letter from employer mentioning the spelling mistake. Also. if time permits get a statement of earning from HMRC. All these should be enough to convince the caseworker.