Thanks for this. But I think we will assume that this case is standing and will continue to stand with the facts pending.
Ok, on page 25 of this document it states:
UKBA Guidance wrote:A person cannot vary their leave if they have an appeal either pending or which could be brought. For more information, see related link: Section 3C leave.
However, the Home Office has suggested she make a "fresh" (their words) application. Is this not different from asking for a variation of leave? If this is not, and they are indeed recommending a variation with this fresh application then that law states:
Immigration Act 1971 - as ammended wrote:3C Continuation of leave pending variation decisionE+W+S+N.I...
(4)A person may not make an application for variation of his leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom while that leave is extended by virtue of this section.
If I understand correctly now, then my original understanding that you cannot make any other application while an appeal is pending is based on this statement.
That statement follows....
Immigration Act 1971 - as ammended wrote:
(1)This section applies if—
(a)a person who has limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom applies to the Secretary of State for variation of the leave,
(b)the application for variation is made before the leave expires, and
(c)the leave expires without the application for variation having been decided.
All of which applies in her case.
However....
Immigration Act 1971 - as ammended wrote:
(5)But subsection (4) does not prevent the variation of the application mentioned in subsection (1)(a).
The relevant parts I believe I quoted above.
So, you saying that the Home Office has suggested she make a 'fresh' application for Further Leave to Remain, and that this is in effect
*varying* her original leave.
Now back to the guidance in which it states:
UKBA Guidance wrote:
Section 3C(4) of the 1971 Act prevents the applicant from making a new application for a variation of leave while they have 3C leave. This means that if an applicant with 3C leave submits a new application, you can automatically consider this to be invalid.
Seems clear to me, i.e., cannot make a new application while an appeal is pending.
UKBA Guidance wrote:
However, Section 3C(5) of the 1971 Act allows an applicant with 3C leave to vary their application at any time before it is decided. This means that they can ask for their application to be considered on different grounds than their original application. You must check CID to see if an applicant has an outstanding application and whether 3C leave is in effect. If they have, you will need to establish if the applicant wishes the new form to be considered as a variation of the grounds upon which their original application was made.
If a person has 3C leave after you have made a decision on their application and an appeal is pending or can be brought, they can submit additional grounds of appeal up to the time the appeal is heard, if they have permission from the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal. For more information, see related link: 05.0 - Section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971 (As Amended)
An applicant can vary an application (not in appeal) before it is decided, which we knew.
*
DEEP BREATH!
So it would seem to me that the Home Office is wrong to advise her to make any application whatsoever based on the law and UKBA guidance. Just to be clear, they have suggested she make a 'fresh' application based on her marriage. In my opinion, my original interpretation (and I presume yours) was that this application will be refused as invalid according to the guidance above, based on the Immigration Act.
Please verify and thank you so much for taking this time.