- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
You were advised about "not leading an independent life" requirement for adult dependants 5 months ago.indianajones wrote: I just came across the underlying material :
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitec ... iew=Binary
From where / how do you get that impression? Did you read clause 1.2 and 1.3?indianajones wrote:I,ve just seen that the Section 5 above seems to be for children seeking to remain in the uk with adoptive parents..?
Yes I was sushdmehta , my understanding, given the scenarios and the case law which served as precedent was that I could keep my job.Flawed as is it might have been , what is my stand 5 months after please? we are talking remedial options now...if indeed I should not be working full time. Thankssushdmehta wrote:You were advised about "not leading an independent life" requirement for adult dependants 5 months ago.indianajones wrote: I just came across the underlying material :
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitec ... iew=Binary
From here sushdmehta http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitec ... iew=Binary . Ok will read the links you provided now.sushdmehta wrote:From where / how do you get that impression? Did you read clause 1.2 and 1.3?indianajones wrote:I,ve just seen that the Section 5 above seems to be for children seeking to remain in the uk with adoptive parents..?
Read 197(iii) (to be read in conjunction with last paragraph of rule 198) and 319J(d).
Yous don't seem to understand my issue sushdmehta.The fact that I should not live and "independent life" is not in doubt I have seen those provisions and have concurred as to its application to me. My confusion only stems from not knowing the interpretation a case worker would give it (independent life). and whether working full time tilts the balance unfavorably. Between thanks a lot for taking your time on this.sushdmehta wrote:From where / how do you get that impression? Did you read clause 1.2 and 1.3?indianajones wrote:I,ve just seen that the Section 5 above seems to be for children seeking to remain in the uk with adoptive parents..?
Read 197(iii) (to be read in conjunction with last paragraph of rule 198) and 319J(d).
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIAT/2007/00051.html By having been an integral part of our family unit.sushdmehta wrote:Reading gidoc's response in your previous topic should be useful.
In context, other than the "dependant" stamp in your passport, how are you dependent on your sponsor (mother)? Please reply in line with the requirements outlined in clause 3.
gidocs response is undoubtedly useful, the only twist is that I am working full time ...sushdmehta wrote:Reading gidoc's response in your previous topic should be useful.
In context, other than the "dependant" stamp in your passport, how are you dependent on your sponsor (mother)? Please reply in line with the requirements outlined in clause 3.
Even if you submit a resignation letter to your employer on Monday morning before your appointment at the PEO, you will still be "employed and working full-time" until you serve the notice period (if any)!indianajones wrote:do I resign my job first thing monday morning?
The underlying "principle" of the requirement remains the same!sushdmehta wrote:Read 197(iii) (to be read in conjunction with last paragraph of rule 198)
Not overlooked, is not a requirement. Criminality threshold does not apply for HSMP migrants (and dependants) covered by HSMP JR.indianajones wrote: I also had a criminal conviction for driving with an international license in December: totally overlooked.