- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Thanks a lot for your reply Greenie. I understand the reasons for the refusal are correct but I only know that now. When I was applying I didn't understand the new rules (they're way more complex than they used to) so I rang the UKBA helpline several times (accompanied by a British friend who's my witness) and THEY were the ones that said I was OK with the established presence since I completed a degree in the UK and therefore I acted accordingly to the advise given.Greenie wrote:The refusal is correct so i can't see how there would be any grounds of successful appeal.
You are such a hypocrite!! Do you think borrowing £5400 and putting it in your account for 28 days to show you have sufficient funds is not unfair, irresponsible and misleading?? You got what you deserved. You just became lazy and got caught. HaD del Cid wrote:Thanks a lot for your reply Greenie. I understand the reasons for the refusal are correct but I only know that now. When I was applying I didn't understand the new rules (they're way more complex than they used to) so I rang the UKBA helpline several times (accompanied by a British friend who's my witness) and THEY were the ones that said I was OK with the established presence since I completed a degree in the UK and therefore I acted accordingly to the advise given.Greenie wrote:The refusal is correct so i can't see how there would be any grounds of successful appeal.
The sad thing is that I could have borrowed the £5400 and have it in my account for 28 days if it was absolutely necessary but I trusted the opinion of an official so my point is, if the law is so crystal clear then how could the own Border Agency experts get it wrong?
Still not a good enough reason to appeal? I just feel it's really unfair and irresponsible to mislead people like that. Hope to hear your view about my point. Thanks again!
You who advocates fake bank accounts in Pakistan telling someone else they are a Hypocrite - mmm interestingruskcake wrote:You are such a hypocrite!! Do you think borrowing £5400 and putting it in your account for 28 days to show you have sufficient funds is not unfair, irresponsible and misleading?? You got what you deserved. You just became lazy and got caught. HaD del Cid wrote:Thanks a lot for your reply Greenie. I understand the reasons for the refusal are correct but I only know that now. When I was applying I didn't understand the new rules (they're way more complex than they used to) so I rang the UKBA helpline several times (accompanied by a British friend who's my witness) and THEY were the ones that said I was OK with the established presence since I completed a degree in the UK and therefore I acted accordingly to the advise given.Greenie wrote:The refusal is correct so i can't see how there would be any grounds of successful appeal.
The sad thing is that I could have borrowed the £5400 and have it in my account for 28 days if it was absolutely necessary but I trusted the opinion of an official so my point is, if the law is so crystal clear then how could the own Border Agency experts get it wrong?
Still not a good enough reason to appeal? I just feel it's really unfair and irresponsible to mislead people like that. Hope to hear your view about my point. Thanks again!
Wow! Hold your horses. I have never at any stage in any of post advocated using fake bank accounts.pennylessinindia wrote:You who advocates fake bank accounts in Pakistan telling someone else they are a Hypocrite - mmm interestingruskcake wrote:You are such a hypocrite!! Do you think borrowing £5400 and putting it in your account for 28 days to show you have sufficient funds is not unfair, irresponsible and misleading?? You got what you deserved. You just became lazy and got caught. HaD del Cid wrote:Thanks a lot for your reply Greenie. I understand the reasons for the refusal are correct but I only know that now. When I was applying I didn't understand the new rules (they're way more complex than they used to) so I rang the UKBA helpline several times (accompanied by a British friend who's my witness) and THEY were the ones that said I was OK with the established presence since I completed a degree in the UK and therefore I acted accordingly to the advise given.Greenie wrote:The refusal is correct so i can't see how there would be any grounds of successful appeal.
The sad thing is that I could have borrowed the £5400 and have it in my account for 28 days if it was absolutely necessary but I trusted the opinion of an official so my point is, if the law is so crystal clear then how could the own Border Agency experts get it wrong?
Still not a good enough reason to appeal? I just feel it's really unfair and irresponsible to mislead people like that. Hope to hear your view about my point. Thanks again!