This will cover 2 parts, however please first note the following warning:
warning wrote:The problem with travelling in the way described here is that many embassy personnel, airline staff and/or border-guards never heard of this provision. So you might hear that what´s written here is incorrect (although it is correct) and you might have a hard time travelling this way in general. Be prepared to argue. Possibly a lot. You are legally entitled to travel, however some rare cases of being denied in spite of everything are known!
This is not legal advice - I´m not a qualified lawyer - I´m just presenting the result of my own research, which may be wrong partly or in its entirety!
EEA family member Residence Card holder (Part 1): This only applies to you if
- you are a family-member of an EEA-citizen AND
- legally living inside the EU but outside Schengen (=UK, Ireland, Bulgaria, Romania and Cyprus) AND
- You have been given a "Residence card of a family member of a Union citizen"
- If any of the above is not the case, check Part 2!
- >>This<< thread contains all details (it was originally written covering Ireland, however it´s the same throughout the UK, Ireland, Bulgaria, Romania and Cyprus).
- The German Embassy in London issued this >>letter<< to someone from this forum, which confirms the same. (I cannot find the original post anymore, but would like to give credit... Can someone fill me in here?)
- Success stories (I will update this as they keep trickling in):
- >>from London (UK) to Faro (Portugal) and back from Porto (Portugal) with a UK-issued EEA Residence Card<<.
- >>from Belfast (UK) to Paris (France) with a UK-issued EEA Residence Card<<.
- >>from London (UK) to Amsterdam (Netherlands) with a UK EEA Residence Card, issued based on a long-term relationship (not married)<<
- >>from Dublin (Ireland) to London (UK) with an Irish 4EUFam<<
EEA family member without Residence Card (Part 2): This only applies to you if
- you are a family-member of an EEA-citizen AND
- Not (yet) in possession of the residence-card as per Part 1 OR
- legally living outside the EU altogether
>>Article 5, Section 4 of 2004/38/EC<< reads as follows:
In practice you takeWhere a Union citizen, or a family member who is not a national of a Member State, does not have the necessary travel documents or, if required, the necessary visas, the Member State concerned shall, before turning them back, give such persons every reasonable opportunity to obtain the necessary documents or have them brought to them within a reasonable period of time or to corroborate or prove by other means that they are covered by the right of free movement and residence.
- both passports AND
- some proof of residence AND
- your marriage-certificate, officially translated and if necessary with a Hague-apostil
- basically you take all papers you would need to apply for the permit as per "Part 1"
- Success stories
- >>Chinese/UK citizen, married, living in HongKong, entering France without anything<<.
- (admittedly the French IO probably mistook the UK-ILE as their Residence Card, but still...)
- >>Chinese/UK citizen, married, living in HongKong, entering France without anything<<.
[u][b]Beware[/b][/u] wrote: This section is even less known than the one before, so although you are entitled to travel, it may be wise to get a visa just to make sure
Additional rare exception:
- If you are
- a family member of an EEA-citizen AND
- living outside the EEA altogether AND
- you intend to travel to the country of which the EEA-member is a national,
- example1: Thai wife with Swedish husband, resident in Laos, travelling to Sweden
- example2: non-EEA wife with EEA husband, resident in non-EEA country, travelling to home country of EEA-national
- then you will ironically still need a visa just for that country , in spite of being allowed to visit all other EEA-countries visa-free
Related links / more reading / more info:
- You should take the printed law with you >>in English<<, >>your native language<< and the country of destination´s language. Highlight the relevant passage to help you in your possibly upcoming argument... See full >>practical guide here<<.
- Closely related, also read >>this blog<<, which contains many more details and some links to success stories.
- I made >>some suggestions<< to the authorities how this could be improved/simplified/clarified, but obviously this is being ignored.
- You should know your stuff and have the law handy.
- Ask for superiors of whoever wants to deny you. This could be airport/airline staff and/or border guards.
- If (whoever) finally denies you, make sure to get in writing that the EEA and the non-EEA citizens were present together, and intended to travel together
- Ideally, get something like >>this<< filled out. (Self written by me, feel free to copy/change/amend/publish..., no guarantees whatsoever)
- Otherwise, once you sue (whoever denied you) and they finally realise that they will lose their case, they will simply claim that the non-EEA person wanted to travel alone, such as in >>this<< case.
- In case written confirmation is refused: Ask (politely but firmly) to be interviewed by police.
- This will leave a proving paper trail.
- Do not leave the check-in desk without boarding pass (or written refusal), never back off passport control without written refusal. Insist that the only way to get rid of you is either
- letting you pass OR
- giving a refusal in writing OR
- arrest, so you have something in writing
- It should then be possible to sue (whoever stopped you) for compensation
- Last but not least: If you want to be 100% sure to travel, take out a visa.
warning wrote:The problem with travelling in the way described here is that many embassy personnel, airline staff and/or border-guards never heard of this provision. So you might hear that what´s written here is incorrect (although it is correct) and you might have a hard time travelling this way in general. Be prepared to argue. Possibly a lot. You are legally entitled to travel, however some rare cases of being denied in spite of everything are known!
This is not legal advice - I´m not a qualified lawyer - I´m just presenting the result of my own research, which may be wrong partly or in its entirety!