hi 1+3+1 victim- think about these 2 points

[inderjit]

hi
we can forward our case to human rights agianst following two points :
(A). For those who got visa extended before 3 April 06, they have so far 1+3 years stay. For ILR, they would need further 1 year extension.
For those who got visa extended after 3 April 06,even they have same skill, qualification and experience they got 1+4 years visa, sufficient to take them to application of ILR (should fulfill the point criteria?).
there is full contradiction in rule
Migration policy is the right of the UK Government but, it should not contradict with its earlier policies.
(B). in new forms age points are relevent only for initial candidate and for whom applying for first extension. for example to get 20 points you need to be under 27 and you can get same point if you applying for first extension after two year period of initial visa with age 27+2=29, in same way after 1+3 year extension there must be provision to get same 20 points age should be 27+4=31. but in forms I think they only considerd initial visa and first extension, they forget to considered 2nd extension after 4 yrs.
inderjit

[olisun]

hi
we can forward our case to human rights agianst following two points :
(A). For those who got visa extended before 3 April 06, they have so far 1+3 years stay. For ILR, they would need further 1 year extension.
For those who got visa extended after 3 April 06,even they have same skill, qualification and experience they got 1+4 years visa, sufficient to take them to application of ILR (should fulfill the point criteria?).
there is full contradiction in rule
Migration policy is the right of the UK Government but, it should not contradict with its earlier policies.
(B). in new forms age points are relevent only for initial candidate and for whom applying for first extension. for example to get 20 points you need to be under 27 and you can get same point if you applying for first extension after two year period of initial visa with age 27+2=29, in same way after 1+3 year extension there must be provision to get same 20 points age should be 27+4=31. but in forms I think they only considerd initial visa and first extension, they forget to considered 2nd extension after 4 yrs.
inderjit

Sorry but I fail to understand how do the above 2 points violate human rights?

[Rog]

There is an unfairness if different yardsticks are applied to similar people of which one group applied for FLR after initial HSMP after a certain date was given 4 year extension whereas the other group who applied before a certain date and was given 3 year extension and the second group are now are looking at being deported. Also HSMP applicants were expected to be holding managerial jobs with a certain level of experience in their home country and after 4 years in UK cannot expected to be 27-28, hence the age discrimination against older applicants which is in violation with UK's own laws prohibiting such discrimination.

There is tendancy of certain members of the forum who are in highly paid positions to try to justify the unfair retrospective changes which is taunting to a large section of HSMP holders and I request them to avoid the same.