- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
I am not crying , I was laughing at your stupid comments, My previous laughters show it.shockboy2000 wrote: Get a tissue, stop crying and have a nice weekend
Post was for argument, but if some one does not wants to understand , then I need to give up at some point of time ? I can't break my head hitting on a wallwebhunter wrote:
It's surprising to often see posts saying ' I dont want to argue .... ' . If someone does'nt want to argue or is wise enough (assuming..), then why do they post at all.
No, Not that way. Please don't misunderstand me, but it is the other way round.Are you seriously suggesting they have deliberately target HSMP holders just because lots of them are Asian?
Agree with Pass. When I applied HSMP, I had carefully filled in the form. I don't know why the HO lowered the criteria and then suddenly raise the threshold much higher. I think I am going to argue it in court in the future when my 1+3 permit expire, if the judicial review doesn't come to our favour.PASS wrote: HSMP application:
I agree that HO recent changes are unfair. We are discussing mainly about those already here. I have seen old HSMP application, which requires the applicant to specify
a. Ability to continue in chosen field
b. Ability to earn XK £ in the first 12 months
Summary: If you are able to fulfil a&b specified in your application, then, you can argue in the court of law to keep your stay even if the rules are changed. To be honest, based on this forum messages, HO extended the stay of many (in the past) on yearly basis even if a&b are not fulfilled. Do you want to say HO is not fair with applicants? All the problems are partially due to misjudgement of candidate's ability to survive in a fluid economy.