- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
In UK P60 is issued by the employer, and In India Form 16 is issued by the employer. When P60 is acceptable, I see no reason why Form 16 should not be acceptable. P60 and Form 16 are prepared and signed by the employer, so they are not self assessment documents.paramjit2k wrote:If P60 can be taken as valid ITR proof, then FORM 16 shud be also.
nakvis wrote:Hi,
My application is rejected with reason "Not submitted original Income Tax Returns".
I have submitted SARAL Form with STAMP on it as original income tax returns. They have refused to accept it as proof.
Has anyone have any ideas on how to convince them that the SARAL is the original IT Returns for Indian Income. Should I resend them the SARAL along with request for review. (Request for review form says NO ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS TO BE ATTACHED).
Please help me in handling this case.
Thanks
Without Form-16, you can't even file the SARAL, it means, if you have the SARAL, it implies that you already had Form-16. So, SARAL is more valuable document than Form-16, provided it's Stamped+Signed. Please let me know if anyone's case got rejected due to not providing Form-16 but SARAL (stamped+signed).paramjit2k wrote:Hi hsmp28122006...
Still do u think, without form 16 SARAL has some importance. We all know NO.
Your SARAL is sufficient proof, no need of Form-16, since it's signed and stamped with date.nnj10 wrote:Hi Nakvis,
In my case, the employer has not signed the Copy of Form-16, as Original was already submitted with SARAL.
The SARAL (This we file in duplicate, i.e. One copy is with IT-Dept, one is given back to the tax payer, with sr. no, date and sign), is with date, sign and stamp as required.
NNJ10
Dont speculate anything on your own...None knows which is perfect ITR proof for Indians.hsmp28122006 wrote:Your SARAL is sufficient proof, no need of Form-16, since it's signed and stamped with date.nnj10 wrote:Hi Nakvis,
In my case, the employer has not signed the Copy of Form-16, as Original was already submitted with SARAL.
The SARAL (This we file in duplicate, i.e. One copy is with IT-Dept, one is given back to the tax payer, with sr. no, date and sign), is with date, sign and stamp as required.
NNJ10
Paramjit,paramjit2k wrote:Dont speculate anything on your own...None knows which is perfect ITR proof for Indians.hsmp28122006 wrote:Your SARAL is sufficient proof, no need of Form-16, since it's signed and stamped with date.nnj10 wrote:Hi Nakvis,
In my case, the employer has not signed the Copy of Form-16, as Original was already submitted with SARAL.
The SARAL (This we file in duplicate, i.e. One copy is with IT-Dept, one is given back to the tax payer, with sr. no, date and sign), is with date, sign and stamp as required.
NNJ10
It is still arguable without form 16, Saral form has no basis. Even for Income tax dept in India. How can u say it is valid for HSMP.
Thats not really true- saral amount and form 16 amount will mostly not match because most of us have some additional income other than job - from investments , interests etc. also form 16 will have a sal amount but saral will have a taxable amount which will be less than form 16 amount due to deductions allowed...sunil.suneel wrote:hi,
As the Original Form 16 is always retained by the IT department , this fact is known to the HO guys, this is not a new requirment by the HSMP team , they have been doing this for years. And there are thousands of indians who have got thru the HSMP porcess with these evidences.
All we need to do for the requirments of ITR is to Provide the Original Saral that reflects the Gross mentioned on the Form 16 along with the copy of Form 16.
If you have mentioned lesser amount on Saral than seen on the Form 16 , then buddy , your application is surely rejected.
cheers,
Sunil