- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Anis thanks for coming back.anishpadela wrote:Hi Jes...
Thanks for the reply...I can feel your pain...Ofcourse this is not end of the world...But I am taking up this as I believe we shoudl not give up just like that and fight as long as we can to prove our point.
I need some clarification:
1. Letter to the MP of my destined province means MP in Ontario if I thats my destined province??
2. Shall I send new evidences to CHC, London and also to Ottawa? If yes, where in Ottawa? Whats the address for that? Do I need to keep a lawyer for that or directly I can send them??
Kindly guide me further.
I am in the process of collecting facts and will be done by 10th of Feb and then I will send across to the people.
Rgds
Anis
No way you would have got 25 points but yes 22 points they should have awarded to you.anishpadela wrote:Dear Experts
My case is been refused by CHC, London. I claimed points as under and was awardec as under:
Claimed Awarded
Age 10 10
Language 14 14
Education 25/22 20
Experience 21 21
I have done my Post Graduate Diploma in Business Management from one of th institute which is recgnised by All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE) in India. AICTE is the statutory body, established for proper planning & co-ordinated development of technical education system throughout the country. It registers and approves all the institutes for its programs. The same way, mine is also recgnised by AICTE. At the time of sending documetns, I send the copy of AICTE approval given to my institute as well as copy of University letter given to my instituite accrediting that PGDBM is equivalent to MBA run in the university. On that bases I cailmed points more than 20. Considering those facts, I should have been given points which are more than 20 and it can went through. Below is the reponse I received from CHC:
"I have considered your submissions for for awarding more than 20 pooints for your for educatoin for your Post Graduate Diploam in Business Management from TIMS. However I dids not find any evidence that institute is recognised by University Grants Comission of India. Regulation of 73 of IRPA suggests that a training institute should be recognised by the authorities responsible for registering, accrediting, supervising and regulating such institites in teh country of issue" This would not include recognition from any university. So I am awarding you 20 points for your education."
This is simply not done as I have provided them letter of university just to establish the equivalency. I have never claimed that my institute is recognisd by the univerysity. Copy of the degree and all the transcripts have wel written that the institute is recognised by AICTE and copy of AICTE was also included as part of documentation. I believe this is erro on part of visa officer and she did not consider some of the facts I provided. Netiher she asked for more facts if she has any dounbts for any of them.
Further, I am consering the option to ask them for re-consideration of the my assessment. To prove my points, I am planning to submit below documents:
1. A copy of AICTE law issued by Govt. of India passed by parliament in 1987 along with cover letter from AICTE declaring their status as recognising body.
2. Letter from my institute declaring their AICTE approval along with copy of registration they have for teh year 2006-2007.
3. Letter from AICTE declaring that PGDBM is equivalent to MBA.
4. Some other facts from the websits of AICTE, Higher Education Dept. and University Grants Commission.
For further analysis of my facts, I request you to go to some links below:
http://www.ugc.ac.in/studyindia/programs/structure.html
http://www.aicte.ernet.in/download/act.pdf
I am planning to write a strong submission letter to Program Manager of CHC, London as well as review branch in Ottawa.
Further to this, I request all the panel experts to guide me about reconsideration, deatils I need to keep in mind, proceure, If any or any other relavant details. Also let me know if i can send the facts to some other relvant authorities as well.
I have decided to put up the fight as I strongly feel I am right and I should not give up like this.
Kindly help me with your words and be with me for my jounrney to fight for the truth.
Rgds
Anis Padela