- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Correct, but providing evidence that is not asked for will avoid them arbitrarily refusing the application for something they may suspect in the absence of any indications to the contrary. It would cost nothing to include this information. Historically, Polish female and non-EU male would be ringing all the alarm bells. That's been the reality whether we like it or not. I'm trying to help the OP avoid this.Obie wrote:Well at the initial stages there is no need to prove that the marriage is not one of convenience.
Well it is open for an applicant to provide evidence of relationship, but there are no legal requirement for them to do so. The burden of proof in a marriage of convenience case lies with the Secretary of State. Several caselaws confirms this. Once the Secretary of state discharges the burden, then the appellant or applicant will have to rebuff it.Lucapooka wrote:Correct, but providing evidence that is not asked for will avoid them arbitrarily refusing the application for something they may suspect in the absence of any indications to the contrary. It would cost nothing to include this information. Historically, Polish female and non-EU male would be ringing all the alarm bells. That's been the reality whether we like it or not. I'm trying to help the OP avoid this.Obie wrote:Well at the initial stages there is no need to prove that the marriage is not one of convenience.
5.1.5 Marriage of convenience / Civil partnership of convenience
Read Annex A