- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Where is the "banging head against a brick wall" emoticon?Greenie wrote:ACCA is not a recognised body, as defined in UK law not just immigration law
A recognised body is one that has been granted degree awarding powers by Royal Charter or Act of Parliament. The fact that for one category of the rules, UKBA accepted vocational/professional qualifications of equivalent level to academic qualifications as scoring the necessary points under the qualification category does not mean it is therefore obliged to do so for another competely separate category in particular when it specifically set out which qualifications were accepted and made no provision for vocational/professional qualifications of an equivalent level to qualify. The rules for PSW were specifically drafted to restrict eligbility to those who had been awarded specific qualifications as set out in the rules, presumably to limit the numbers who were able to qualify for an otherwise simple category (as opposed to tier 1 general which also required applicants to score points in other areas such as previous earnings).
The fact that (and I assume you are talking about tier 1 general and not HSMP but the argument remains the same), for Tier 1 General it was specifically set out in the Appendix that vocational/professional qualifications of equivalent level were accepted, but in PSW it did not, actually disproves your point, I do hope that you are not paying your barrister to make such a poor and misguided argument.
Some people (me for one) have been saying all along that ACCA qualifications do not appear to meet the rules. If anyone is the victim of anything it appears to be wishful thinking.hassan5805 wrote:Greenie i wasnt agree with you before coz a lot people were getting visas on the basis of fundamental level but now days UKBa scrutinising the all the appeals and sending lawyers too i think a lot people have been victamised of these forums.. But hope for good hope ACCA student wins JR on the the hearing date is 17rh April..
well tht was thier choice but its fact that a lot acca student got psw on the basis of fundamental level i dnt knw y u nt convincing if i won my appeal then i will upload here for prove.. loads of my friends won thier cases wholly basis on acca..,PaperPusher wrote:Some people (me for one) have been saying all along that ACCA qualifications do not appear to meet the rules. If anyone is the victim of anything it appears to be wishful thinking.hassan5805 wrote:Greenie i wasnt agree with you before coz a lot people were getting visas on the basis of fundamental level but now days UKBa scrutinising the all the appeals and sending lawyers too i think a lot people have been victamised of these forums.. But hope for good hope ACCA student wins JR on the the hearing date is 17rh April..
Borrowed from another thread...PaperPusher wrote:Where is the "banging head against a brick wall" emoticon?Greenie wrote:ACCA is not a recognised body, as defined in UK law not just immigration law
A recognised body is one that has been granted degree awarding powers by Royal Charter or Act of Parliament. The fact that for one category of the rules, UKBA accepted vocational/professional qualifications of equivalent level to academic qualifications as scoring the necessary points under the qualification category does not mean it is therefore obliged to do so for another competely separate category in particular when it specifically set out which qualifications were accepted and made no provision for vocational/professional qualifications of an equivalent level to qualify. The rules for PSW were specifically drafted to restrict eligbility to those who had been awarded specific qualifications as set out in the rules, presumably to limit the numbers who were able to qualify for an otherwise simple category (as opposed to tier 1 general which also required applicants to score points in other areas such as previous earnings).
The fact that (and I assume you are talking about tier 1 general and not HSMP but the argument remains the same), for Tier 1 General it was specifically set out in the Appendix that vocational/professional qualifications of equivalent level were accepted, but in PSW it did not, actually disproves your point, I do hope that you are not paying your barrister to make such a poor and misguided argument.
hassan5805 wrote:well tht was thier choice but its fact that a lot acca student got psw on the basis of fundamental level i dnt knw y u nt convincing if i won my appeal then i will upload here for prove.. loads of my friends won thier cases wholly basis on acca..,PaperPusher wrote:Some people (me for one) have been saying all along that ACCA qualifications do not appear to meet the rules. If anyone is the victim of anything it appears to be wishful thinking.hassan5805 wrote:Greenie i wasnt agree with you before coz a lot people were getting visas on the basis of fundamental level but now days UKBa scrutinising the all the appeals and sending lawyers too i think a lot people have been victamised of these forums.. But hope for good hope ACCA student wins JR on the the hearing date is 17rh April..
you are ryte no fairness at all sme of all my friends are on psw but thts shocking that they are taking them in the upper court but we all hve to wait and see coz i m really hoping thst we win JR no i am going for lower court appeal which is nxt year..ssunny1985 wrote:hassan5805 wrote:well tht was thier choice but its fact that a lot acca student got psw on the basis of fundamental level i dnt knw y u nt convincing if i won my appeal then i will upload here for prove.. loads of my friends won thier cases wholly basis on acca..,PaperPusher wrote:Some people (me for one) have been saying all along that ACCA qualifications do not appear to meet the rules. If anyone is the victim of anything it appears to be wishful thinking.hassan5805 wrote:Greenie i wasnt agree with you before coz a lot people were getting visas on the basis of fundamental level but now days UKBa scrutinising the all the appeals and sending lawyers too i think a lot people have been victamised of these forums.. But hope for good hope ACCA student wins JR on the the hearing date is 17rh April..
Hassan are you going for JR. This law is bullshit and not based on fairness which border agency has made it. Professional students should get a right for PSW. Now border agency is going for Upper tribunal against those students who win their cases in lower courts. why before border agency did not think to go for it. Why border agency did not try to make their position clear. I have a lots of friends who win their cases in lower courts and living in UK on PSW visa.
On what basis are you going to appeal?smehmood wrote:One of my client had refusal on ACCA qualification.
We made an oral appeal on grounds of 2 previous cases where the students were granted PSW on ACCA qualification and a error in law made by UKBA. as my client was served with removal instruction with refusal letter which violation of Section 43 C of immigration act.
Judge has allowed the appeal but only Extant to Removal letter is not accordance with law.
we are going to appeal against the 1st Tribunel Decision.
Regards
Nahid court cant implement one case decision on all the cases. Because every case ground is different than the other. May be some cases ground is similar and they would be able to implement decision on these cases. I know that my cost is too much for JR. Lawyer can make grounds but these grounds forward to border agency with the name of the person who prepare grounds. And lawyer is not the right person to defend cases in upper court. IF your grounds prepared by barrister then it will show your seriousness.And if April case is the test case who is going to fight that case. Who is going to defend all ACCA students.NAHID wrote:JR submission 1800 is little too much, however its not barrister's job rather solicitors are enable to carry out such work. question is Do they know what they are doing and Admin court would not accept further JR until Mid april 2012 because test case will be heard on mid april 2013.
Good luck in your JR and wish you safe outcome.
ACCA qualification are acceptable for Tier-1 Post study work Migrant and meet Appendix A. because its qualifications are recognised
Some people would not be agree with me but believe me some people with their cases even from upper tribunal and UKBA's challenge did not work at the end.
hassan5805 wrote:i think after UPP can go to JR isnt???Greenie wrote:The tribunal do not grant visas (or indeed residence permits) if an appeal is allowed by the first tier tribunal but this is overturned by the Upper tier then the leave is never granted.