ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
Hi - no, I'm not on Skydrive, too much of a numpty to figure out what I'm sure is a very easy process!Damanisshallo wrote:
Please confirm if you are on Skydrivewith a different name?
Please stop this line of questioning. It is not helpful to anybody on this forum. To set the record straight, Fedup is my sponsor/wife. She is free to express herself as a person, sponsor, and British citizen. We are individuals with individual perspectives and thoughts. I love my wife, but we don't always agree on things or share the same approach to challenges. That is why she felt a need to join and I made no effort to associate with her comments.ak145m wrote:Can't stop laughing with the idea that fedup and backagain are the same person with the split personality issue..lol, well can't blame that person as joblessness and wait can cause these issues. funny how admin caught the person and even when he/she is refusing to budge. Damanisshallo you are clever ..lol
I always thought this was the case. However, I believe no one is having a vendetta. Its all done and dusted. I hope now since you've cleared the misconception everything should be fine.backagain wrote:Fedup is my sponsor/wife.
Just a bit of knowledge about how IP addresses work and this is easily circumvented as 90% of the UK broadband using population have a dynamic IP address as opposed to static IP. Simply turn off your router then back on again and your ISP assigns a completely new IP address only they know who had what address at what time. Simples!John wrote:Members need to be aware that Moderators can see the IP address used whenever a member posts. Also members are reminded that it is against the T&Cs of this board to have multiple IDs.
So some explaining to do, why were the posts above made today at 9.27.am and 10.15.am made from the same (BT) IP address? Lack of satisfactory explanation will see both members banned.
susoroh wrote: My partner's current visa runs out 17/01/2012 and his workplace are talking about suspension if we have not heard back by then
Damanisshallo wrote:susoroh wrote: My partner's current visa runs out 17/01/2012 and his workplace are talking about suspension if we have not heard back by then
Since you've already submitted your biometrics you should be on the system. Please give them (Your Employer) this. However if they hesitate to help you out take this along with your Acknowledgement & Biometric invitation letter and ask them to have a look at Frequently Asked Questions->What is my immigration status while my application is being decided? from the link.
You can also show them section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971 from the Legislation.
But I also need to warn you that in-spite of having so many evidences, it purely depends on your luck and the person you are talking to. Coz not all HR's are well qualified. So Good luck. Also tell your employer that they request a response from UKBA using ECS and once they get a positive response it can be used for 12 months.
susoroh wrote:Thanks so much for this Damanisshallo, really appreciate it. We are emailing the links to his personnel manager now, and have also emailed our MP.
This document should help you if your partner's employer becomes adamant wrote:This page explains how employers should avoid unlawful discrimination in their recruitment and employment practices while seeking to prevent illegal working, by carrying out the appropriate document checks on all of their employees.
It is important to remember that the UK population is ethnically diverse. Many people from ethnic minorities in this country are British citizens, and many non-British citizens from black and minority ethnic communities are entitled to work here. Therefore, you must not assume that someone from an ethnic minority is an immigrant, or that someone born abroad is not entitled to work in the UK.
Employers who refuse to consider anyone who looks or sounds foreign are likely to be unlawfully discriminating on facial grounds. If document checks are carried out only for prospective employees who by their appearance or accent seem not to be British, this too may constitute unlawful facial discrimination. If a tribunal upholds a complaint of facial discrimination, there is no upper limit on the amount of compensation that the employer can be ordered to pay.
Employers have a legal duty under current race relations legislation to avoid unlawful discrimination on facial grounds, and are therefore advised to carry out document checks on every prospective employee. The best way for employers to make sure that they do not discriminate is to treat all job applicants in the same way at each stage of their recruitment process.
HOW TO AVOID facial DISCRIMINATION wrote:7.8 If a person is not able to produce the appropriate listed document(s), you should not assume that he or she is living or working in the UK illegally. You should instead refer the person to the Border and Immigration Agency through the Immigration Enquiry Bureau on 0870 606 7766, or a Citizens Advice Bureau for advice. You should try to keep the job open for as long as possible, but you are not obliged to do so if you need to recruit someone urgently. It is ultimately the decision of the employer whether or not to employ an individual.
Ugh, when my husband requested his passport back they told him that it generally takes six WEEKS from when the biometrics were enrolled. Clearly months is more accurate, but I wish they hadn't just told him nonsense!susoroh wrote: UKBA also informed my local MP that it is likely that your FLR(M) application will take around six months from the date you submitted your biometrics.
Is this date and year correct? She will qualify for SET(M) in April 2013 irrespective of what her BRP says.habib_motiwala wrote:I had applied for my wife's FLRM in Feb 2011
So sorry to hear your news.findshakil wrote:.... I am so depressed that I gave them so many proofs that I had money in my account with card image and payment page as well. it wasn't my fault but they still didn't accept it.
findshakil wrote:They also wrote that they can't give any information why my bank reject the payment, it is the responsibility of the applicant to ask their bank why payment didn't go through.
Click here to read the full hearing.UKBA must prove the failure of payment wrote:This is an impressive and extremely welcome development in the law. From now on, it seems, applications cannot simply be rejected as invalid by the UKBA on the basis of the assertion that it was not possible to obtain payment. The UKBA will have to provide proof that the application itself was invalid.
The Tribunal ends its determination by stating that to avoid future disputes of the kind in Mr Basnet’s case the UKBA must implement procedures ensuring that postal applications are processed immediately upon receipt, placing them in an approximation of the more favourable circumstances experienced by "personal” applicants, and, moreover that if something goes wrong the applicant is contacted "to afford an opportunity to check or correct the billing data.”
The likelihood is that this clarification of the law as the unfairness of the existing regime – and the recognition that the UKBA bears the burden of proving that an application is invalid, can benefit large numbers of people who have had their applications rejected for this reason. Anyone who is or who may be affected is strongly advised urgently to seek professional legal advice.
