- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
These new changes are mainly about holding funds.kim1 wrote:What changes do we make to our current visa applications file to make them stronger under new rules?
People in process of applying plz contribute to this thread.
Mr MNaveedonline,MNaveedonline wrote:well. After taking Enterprenuer visa, If i will go back to Pak. for 2months holidays and when i will come back, the visa officer check 50,000 pounds funds again for business.
rizwan567 wrote:No change. Apply as normal. Only change is that you may be asked on later date to confirm that you have funds available and you may be called for interview at one of the UKBA offices before decision is reached on your application.
The changes are infect mainly affecting overseas applicants, as after changes ECO has more powers to check the genuineness of application.
_______________________________________________________
P.S: Yes, there is a one change. If you are applying thrugh third party funding then the third party must confirm that funds will be retained until trasnferred to the applicant in the UK. This sentence was previously not needed. And if you apply after 31 Jan and this is not mentioned in the third party declaration, your application can be refused.
rehan01 wrote:Mr MNaveedonline,MNaveedonline wrote:well. After taking Enterprenuer visa, If i will go back to Pak. for 2months holidays and when i will come back, the visa officer check 50,000 pounds funds again for business.
you have posted the same question in every single thread and this is not related to the thread you are posting your question please make a new topic and post your question there so everyone will have a read and reply if possible.
I hope I didn't offended you, apologize in advance
regards
Since you have applied before 31-Jan you should be alright. Worse case scenario will be that you might be requested for additional documentation i.e. a business plan. It would be good if you prepare one, just in case you may need it.sansuni wrote:Hi i applied tier 1 entrepreneur on 23/01/2013 from india
While am applying i have not included business plan,because its not mandatory ,but new rules specify that we may need business plan ,can i know does application will be alright to get entry clerance
The business plan is virtually part of the requirements now?RizKCB wrote:Guys it is a kind of examination in which question paper is already leaked out. We all know what they could ask to provide within 28 days. Just prepare and get ready for that.
If they did not tell us before and started to take decisions???
Get ready if you are genuine or near to be genuine.
Think positive, If you are a genuine applicant and you have a solid plan for business, why would it be disastrous.RizKCB wrote:Who knows? It would be disaster for the victim...
Absolutely correct we have no choice but to produce whatever they request.ac2107 wrote:Exactly, we have no choice but to produce a business plan upon request if a case worker wish to do so. No problem with that at all.
I am just not convinced that they can assess the viability of the business plan, can they really refuse us if they think the plan is not viable?
Maybe, just maybe this business plan thing is only a excuse to test the credibility of the applicant. If one wants to abuse the system maybe he would not bother to prepare a plan at all.
I made my business plan but didnt submitted as this was not the requirement at the time when I applied. But I still had it, if they will ask I will provide them.rahulsingh1 wrote:The ECO/ Caseworker ?
These guys are school pass outs in the UK or would have gone to tier 4 universities. Which is why they landed a job in the UKBA in the first place.
And UKBA is expecting these plebs to do the job of McKinsey & Co (where HBS grads go to work), and that is to evaluate the viability of a business plan. really ?
What rubbish ? I must say Theresa May has gone bonkers and is killing what she is paid to encourage.
I should say if the UKBA is reading this forum, which I know they do.
Is that guys, just do your job, do not go beyond your payscale to judge a business plan. If you were capable of doing that, you would be working in investment banking for goldman sachs.
Most of the people here saying that the changes don't affect the genuine applicants. Well I think most of people applied are genuine with exception of some.ac2107 wrote:Exactly, we have no choice but to produce a business plan upon request if a case worker wish to do so. No problem with that at all.
I am just not convinced that they can assess the viability of the business plan, can they really refuse us if they think the plan is not viable?
Maybe, just maybe this business plan thing is only a excuse to test the credibility of the applicant. If one wants to abuse the system maybe he would not bother to prepare a plan at all.
hham1224 wrote:Most of the people here saying that the changes don't affect the genuine applicants. Well I think most of people applied are genuine with exception of some.ac2107 wrote:Exactly, we have no choice but to produce a business plan upon request if a case worker wish to do so. No problem with that at all.
I am just not convinced that they can assess the viability of the business plan, can they really refuse us if they think the plan is not viable?
Maybe, just maybe this business plan thing is only a excuse to test the credibility of the applicant. If one wants to abuse the system maybe he would not bother to prepare a plan at all.
I am only addressing to the genuine applicants. £50,000 funds are not a small amount (or if you haven't won it in a lottery) it should carefully invested in a right way and when it is necessary. I am not saying it shouldn't be invested but in a right time on a right thing/stock/premises/asset.
UKBA should ask the applicant how £50,000 should be spent in the next three years by way of a cash flow forecast now and ask the applicant later to provide the evidence of actual investment at the time of extension as mentioned in the old rules.
This will give the time to the applicant to think about his business more efficiently and he may expand his business with this investment.
I disagree with UKBA to maintain £50,000 till the end as this will put extra pressure on the applicant same like the £900 funds requirement. Though £900 is not a big amount and can easily be maintained but the rule of even a day gap will reverse the clock kills etc.
Best Wishes,