- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
mukuo79 wrote:Hi,
I made my Tier 1 extension applicaton in August 2012 but unfortunately it got refused and my remaining leave to remain (initial visa was valid until 5th Feb 2013) was also curtailed so that it expires on 28th Dec 2012.
They have retained my passport and other docs submitted.
I have got full appeal rights against the decision and also the decision letter says that:
if you appeal, you do not have to leave UK while the appeal is in progress, your previous leave and terms and conditions attached to it will be extended by virtue of section 3D of the Immigration Act until such a time as the appeal is resolved.
I dont have any doubt that my appeal will be refused straight away as they have solid proof of this deception which I truly accept.
My only concern is to work until the end of Jan 2013 and leave the UK forever.
Please could anybody advise whether I am allowed to work when my appeal is in progress?
I believe I can work as per section 3D while my appeal is in progress and cannot be treated as overstayer even though my leave to remain has been curtailed so that expired on 28th Dec 2012.
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitec ... iew=Binary
Please could anybody confirm this as I desparately want to work for the next 3-4 weeks as my financial situation is very bad.
Does anybody know how long they will take to refuse any appeal?
Kindly help. Thank you
mukuo79 wrote: deception which I truly accept.
A compelling argument & very well writtenmulderpf wrote:I am sorry to hear about your situation mukuo79.
I have to ask though, do you not think that you are potentially digging a deeper hole for yourself by stretching it all out longer? Living in fear that UKBA will contact your employer during your appeal, all for some extra money? Is one month's extra salary really worth it?
How would they have verified the false payslips? Maybe they have spoken to your employer already?
I really do sympathise with your situation, but I cannot help to think that what you are doing is simply wasting the UKBA's time that could be spent on reviewing other applications. People are up in arms because the application process is taking longer and longer, and by submitting an appeal that you know will fail, not only makes the case stronger for the UKBA to start charging for appeals, but you are also disadvantaging legitimate candidates by wasting time with an appeal that will fail.
At the end of the day, you have to look at the bigger picture and decide whether chasing one extra month's salary (which doesn't sound like much if you had to submit false payslips) is really worth it. Is the extra stress and anguish really worth it (it's a rhetorical question - obviously I don't know the details of your situation)?
I don't think it would be good if the point is to alert people who have broken the law to take precautionary measures, some of which may not be legal.manojk005 wrote:Sorry to hear your case. However, it would be good to name the solicitor who did this and convicted. Atleast, it will give advance warning to those who had use same his/her services in past and planning to apply for extension and they can decide tot take this risk.
I am sure that you would know if your solicitor submitted false documents.manojk005 wrote:Sorry to hear your case. However, it would be good to name the solicitor who did this and convicted. Atleast, it will give advance warning to those who had use same his/her services in past and planning to apply for extension and they can decide tot take this risk.
Well I am not interested in getting in any argument with you and do not really care what you think/say. At the same time, I am also not keen to make any comment on you.mulderpf wrote:I am sure that you would know if your solicitor submitted false documents.manojk005 wrote:Sorry to hear your case. However, it would be good to name the solicitor who did this and convicted. Atleast, it will give advance warning to those who had use same his/her services in past and planning to apply for extension and they can decide tot take this risk.
Not unless it is possible to verify the conviction of the person concerned. Moderators keep an eye open for possible libel, so if a person is named, unless a Google (or similar) search produces links to news reports of the conviction, the name will be removed promptly!Sorry to hear your case. However, it would be good to name the solicitor who did this and convicted
very useful, thanksJohn wrote:Not unless it is possible to verify the conviction of the person concerned. Moderators keep an eye open for possible libel, so if a person is named, unless a Google (or similar) search produces links to news reports of the conviction, the name will be removed promptly!Sorry to hear your case. However, it would be good to name the solicitor who did this and convicted
mukuo79, did you not realise the production of the payslips was a criminal act? A criminal act you went along with. I think you will have great difficulties getting back into the UK.
yea as per sec 3C of the immigration act 1971, your visa status will remain the same as it was before until ur appeal rights have been exhausted ie if you were entitled to work as per your visa , you may continue to do so.n8net wrote:Hi guys,I wud like to know if I am allowed to work while the appeal is on going ?