- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
I would advise you to be very very careful from now on.My employer received a work permit extension refusal letter on 25th Jan 2007 saying my employer's evidence does not prove that they are a service provider,
Oh, dear!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I also finished purchase of a flat last month
Second set of papers IS151A Part 2:I have considered all the information available to me and I am satisfied that you are :
A person in respect of whom removal directions may be given in accordance with section 10 of the Imm and Aslum Act 1999 (administrative removal)
With Laibility to Detention
Please note, I haven't received any communication about the notice served on 8th MarchYou were served with form IS151A on 8th March 2007 informing you of your immigration status and your liability to detention and removal. A decision has been taken to remove you from the United Kingdom.
Right of Appeal: You are entitled to appeal this decision under section 82(1) after you have left the UK
This decision will be deemed to have been served on you on the date of service shown below
I left the UK on 16th March. My family's passports were handed over after the security check just 15 minutes before the departure time. I'm now in India.NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE
Liability to removal: The person named is an illegal immigrant as defined in section 33 of immigration act 1971 or a person subject to administrative removal in accordance with section 10 of immigration and asylum act 1999 and as such is liable to be removed from the UK.
Voluntary departure: However, he/she has chosen to depart at his own expense and has purchased a ticket for 16th March.
I suppose he will need to sort out his UK problems as well as he will have problems to get visas/ at immigration as he was removed from the UK. Getting into EU/US/Canada etc. will be almost out of question for the next few years as long as he has this black mark against him.Dawie wrote:I'm afraid I don't have much advice for you expect to say that a good start would be for you and your family to obtain new passports that do not have any record of your removal in them.
What pains me most is having worked for almost 4 years in the UK legally, I was not even given a chance to explain what happenned.
That is British HO! Shameless bunch.What strikes me is that on one hand they say you have to leave as soon as possible, on the other, they cause the delay.
I don't understand this!!! After 4 years of your contribution to this country's wealth / asset creation and value addition and legal stay, the HO threw you and your wife out ("removed") and even your 10 months old baby, and you are still taking about coming back to this country???????????????Whether it is OK to apply for a WP/HSMP again and will there be any problems with EC.
This is the UK, not America! As far as I know we still have freedom of expression in this country...However, criticisms of this nature pre-empting an OISC investigation are tantamount to defamation. Please edit your post to remove this.
Many thanks for removing these comments.Dawie wrote:This is the UK, not America! As far as I know we still have freedom of expression in this country...However, criticisms of this nature pre-empting an OISC investigation are tantamount to defamation. Please edit your post to remove this.
If this practice of threats are encouraged, then i guess the next thing will be the IND which will say "please complain any problems of our service quality to appropriate authority (and not in forums like these) otherwise we will take it as defamation".However, criticisms of this nature pre-empting an OISC investigation are tantamount to defamation. Please edit your post to remove this.
VictoriaS wrote:Rajeev
Please do complain to OISC if you wish. The situation has been explained to you, and I am confident that OISC will clear us of misadvising or of acting unprofessionally.
However, criticisms of this nature pre-empting an OISC investigation are tantamount to defamation. Please edit your post to remove this.
Regards
Victoria
Interesting theory. Personally, I think that the problems occur as a direct result of the Home Office being overbureacratic and inefficient.vin123 wrote:I think all these problem happen due to over commercialization and the extremely competitive strategy applied by similar service providers like yours making use of the flexibility around the UK immigration to target a potentially huge market - especially HSMP seekers. just thoughts !
So it's OK to rubbish the HO in internet forums?I think that the problems occur as a direct result of the Home Office being overbureacratic and inefficient...(and incompetent)
VictoriaS wrote: I think that the problems occur as a direct result of the Home Office being overbureacratic and inefficient.
Victoria