hassan5805 wrote:quantum1 wrote:Don't be too desperate guys. Everyone to competent legal judges say ACCA is not a degree. Refusing to believe and being in denial will not make ACCA a degree. Lets be honest with each other.
well you ryte but the fact is justice has been denied.. Justice definition is fair treatment with everyone but how more than half of them got visa other half not..
Imagine you were in a dispute with a neighbour. They wanted to build an extension which would block light from your property. People had won planning appeals for similar light-blocking extensions. People had also lost their appeals. The council refused the application because the plans did not meet the planning rules. Your neighbour goes to court, loses, submits a further appeal, loses again and appeals again to the High Court. The High Court decide to hear the case as a test case because there has been inconsistent application of the law by the lower courts.
The High Court Judges determine that light blocking extensions are not allowed according to the planning rules. The test case is now part of law as case law.
Your neighbour would not be able to get their extension on the basis of other judges making an incorrect decision. Neither would extensions that have been erroneously allowed by the courts be retrospectively demolished. All appeals in the system and future cases would be decided according to the planning rules and case law from the test case.
That is how the legal system, or justice system, in England and Wales operates.
Justice has more than one definition. The definition you have chosen perhaps relates to when the word justice is used in a moral, but not legal sense.
The test case was heard, precisely because some people had won their appeals and some people lost. From now on people will get the same, lawful, decision, which I think is fair treatment. No one can change what has happened in the past.
Judges do not have to carry on making unlawful decisions because of other judges' mistakes.