ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Naturalization Refrees

General UK immigration & work permits; don't post job search or family related topics!

Please use this section of the board if there is no specific section for your query.

Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator

ishameeque
Newbie
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 2:01 am
Location: United Kingdom

Naturalization Refrees

Post by ishameeque » Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:59 pm

Hello
After having ILR for almost 10 years now, I am planning to apply for my naturalisation. I have friends who will be happy to provide me with reference, who are in well placed jobs (IT Professionals). But, Do I need to get reference from any particular profession ( doctors, lawyers for example). I do not have a doctor or a lawyer friend who knows me for more than three years. Any inputs will be of great help. Thanks

stedman
Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: london

Post by stedman » Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:31 pm

IT professionals are fine. Everyone's a "professional" these days anyway (including plumbers, gardeners, electricians etc)

Marco 72
Diamond Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:53 pm
Location: London

Post by Marco 72 » Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:28 pm

stedman wrote:IT professionals are fine.
Where did you get this information?

stedman
Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: london

Post by stedman » Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:45 pm

IT is a profession, isn't it? And there is nowhere on the naturalization form that asks what profession the referee is anyway. I know someone who used their unemployed neighbour as a referee, successfully. And a few other similar stories. The person being a UK citizen of good standing is the most important thing. They are more fussy when it comes to actually applying for the passport.

Marco 72
Diamond Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:53 pm
Location: London

Post by Marco 72 » Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:00 pm

stedman wrote:IT is a profession, isn't it? And there is nowhere on the naturalization form that asks what profession the referee is anyway.
The form asks for the referee to be "a person of professional standing, such as a doctor, a minister of religion, civil servant or a member of a professional body e.g. accountant or solicitor", which is not exactly the same as saying that they must have a profession.
stedman wrote: I know someone who used their unemployed neighbour as a referee, successfully. And a few other similar stories. The person being a UK citizen of good standing is the most important thing. They are more fussy when it comes to actually applying for the passport.
This was the case until the end of last year, when the new requirement was introduced. In January I called the naturalisation helpline to ask for clarification on this matter and was told that "anyone working in a professional organisation" would do. However, it didn't sound like the person I was talking to had much of a clue about anything. When I asked him if it was necessary for the "person of standing" to have a British passport he said "it doesn't say so", but wouldn't answer my question. In any case, they probably don't carry out referee checks on all applications.

stedman
Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: london

Post by stedman » Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:26 pm

Marco 72 wrote:The form asks for the referee to be "a person of professional standing, such as a doctor, a minister of religion, civil servant or a member of a professional body e.g. accountant or solicitor", which is not exactly the same as saying that they must have a profession.
Sure, but in practice it's more or less the same thing. I'm a doctor and before I got UK citizenship my patients assumed I was British and regularly brought their passport or naturalization forms to me to countersign. I explained why I couldn't do it (even now I am a UK citizen I'm reluctant to sign as I don't know them personally) and their response was always that they knew no-one else of professional standing who had known them for 2/3 years. In almost all cases they took my advice (i.e. do not interpret "professional standing" so rigidly) and gave the forms to random non-relatives to countersign, successfully. It appears as long as the referee isn't a criminal or a vagrant residing under Waterloo bridge the application is unlikely to be turned down.

JAJ
Moderator
Posts: 3977
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 9:29 pm
Australia

Post by JAJ » Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:37 am

Marco 72 wrote:
stedman wrote:IT is a profession, isn't it? And there is nowhere on the naturalization form that asks what profession the referee is anyway.
The form asks for the referee to be "a person of professional standing, such as a doctor, a minister of religion, civil servant or a member of a professional body e.g. accountant or solicitor", which is not exactly the same as saying that they must have a profession.
It might help if the referee was a professional member of the British Computer Society. (http://www.bcs.org)

champion
Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:31 pm

Post by champion » Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:43 pm

The idea of refree from proffessional background is to make sure the person apply for naturalization is part of society and mixing up with people. And minimise the chance of identity theft. Unfortunately those who set the guideline for thenm it finish at teacher , solicitor , doctor.
Well I kept on moving place in every 6 month to 1 year.
My kids are too young to go to school
I never had any legal issue so I never came accross any solicitor.
most of minister of religion of my faith are still holding Indian passport apart from that I am not visiting same temple for 3 years.
Soem people in HO thinks that person won't move much.

I asked HO about this rule and told them that I can't get any of the person mentioned in their list. They said it is fine as far as that person is proffessional enough. Basically anyone who is not on debt or anti social behaviour, and adding something to society with his / work can be a refree.

Christophe
Diamond Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:54 pm

Post by Christophe » Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:46 pm

champion wrote:Well I kept on moving place in every 6 month to 1 year.
Don't forget that "knowing someone for three years" doesn't mean that you have to be in regular day-to-day contact with that person at the time of the application. In other words, you could meet someone today, see them regularly/frequently for the next six months, and then (for example) move house and so not see them often, or even at all. But three years after you met them you would still have known them for three years.

champion
Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:31 pm

Post by champion » Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:54 pm

agree but in real life you don't remain in touch with doctors in your surgery once you moved on. Yes I send them christmas cards but thats all. Unless the doctor knows you personally through friends / pub / neighbour he / she won't remember you.
And even if he remembers, he won't be ready to sign on refree paper unless he knows you well. With coulleague they knows you well they will do it but a doctor whom I visited hardly 4-5 times in my 18 months stay wont do that.
and I moved on to different part of the country and due to the April2nd deadline didnt had time to contact my doctor and see if he can refer me, I opted my coulleague's help.
I will let you know if there is any issue in my referee

Christophe
Diamond Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:54 pm

Post by Christophe » Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:08 pm

Yes, I agree that your family doctor might not be the right person in the circumstances that you describe. But former work colleagues might well be prepared to act as a referee and could well fulfil the time requirements even though you may not be working with them still.

rogerroger
Member of Standing
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:53 pm

Post by rogerroger » Sat May 05, 2007 6:39 pm

the referee section in the naturalisation application is quite vague.

dont seem to have been done by a professional :)


i asked around and some one told me that IT people qualify as professionals. of course some one with a PhD working in the IT industry should be professional, correct?

Marco 72
Diamond Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:53 pm
Location: London

Post by Marco 72 » Sat May 05, 2007 7:09 pm

The form does not say that the referee should be a professional, but rather a "person of professional standing".

transpondia
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: London

Post by transpondia » Sun May 06, 2007 7:44 pm

We obtained a partial list from the Nationality Advice Line.

http://www.londonelegance.com/transpondia/nationality

It is a 'partial' list because there is no official list, and they update this list as they go along. :roll:

ombo
Newly Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 5:38 pm

Post by ombo » Sun May 20, 2007 5:46 pm

I have the same problem - I've only visited a doctor once, talked to a solicitor twice, don't know any accountants and I work in IT where people are not normally members of a professional body.

I've e-mailed the home office and got this reply:
I am sorry but the referees need to meet all of the requirements as
stated in the Notes for Guidance that accompany the application form AN.
There was no mention of other professions (I only mentioned doctor, solicitor, accountant and minister of religion in my e-mail). I understand that their replies are always terse and unhelpful, which is a shame.


Thanks for posting the "partial" list, but it still doesn't help. Anyone knows a solicitor who needs a friend?

champion
Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:31 pm

Post by champion » Sun May 20, 2007 7:30 pm

ombo wrote:I have the same problem - I've only visited a doctor once, talked to a solicitor twice, don't know any accountants and I work in IT where people are not normally members of a professional body.

I've e-mailed the home office and got this reply:
I am sorry but the referees need to meet all of the requirements as
stated in the Notes for Guidance that accompany the application form AN.
There was no mention of other professions (I only mentioned doctor, solicitor, accountant and minister of religion in my e-mail). I understand that their replies are always terse and unhelpful, which is a shame.


Thanks for posting the "partial" list, but it still doesn't help. Anyone knows a solicitor who needs a friend?

Marco 72
Diamond Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:53 pm
Location: London

Post by Marco 72 » Sun May 20, 2007 7:40 pm

That list is exactly the same as the one given by the passport office for passport applications. According to the passport helpline, a university degree counts as a professional qualification. Ombo, if you don't know anyone who appears to meet the criteria, just use two of your colleagues. You will most likely be ok.

maveli62
Junior Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 9:44 am

Post by maveli62 » Mon May 21, 2007 8:50 am

I think the person of professional standing may not be British Citizen anyone residing in UK is eligible. This was told by the Home Office staff and I know a person got naturalisation with a signature from a doctor who holds an Indian Passport holder

Dawie
Diamond Member
Posts: 1699
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:54 pm
Location: Down the corridor, two doors to the left

Post by Dawie » Mon May 21, 2007 9:20 am

I really doubt that the Home Office properly checks the professional standing of your referees. At the most they will check that your referees are indeed British citizens, that they hold British passports and that their signatures on your application form match those held on their records.

But checking the professional standing of each and every referee they come across in all the naturalisation applications they receive every day? They just don't have the resources.
In a few years time we'll look back on immigration control like we look back on American prohibition in the thirties - futile and counter-productive.

SYH
BANNED
Posts: 2137
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: somewhere else now

Post by SYH » Mon May 21, 2007 10:22 am

is there anything reference that explains how they check anything, not just referees but employers and income and the other things they check??

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England
United Kingdom

Post by John » Mon May 21, 2007 11:23 am

They do not publish that information, for obvious reasons. But there are clues. For example when signing the declaration on the application form the applicant authorises access to their record with HMRC, and thus it is suspected that they have access to all the tax and NI records held by HMRC.

Referees? BIA would have easy ability to access details of the British passport numbers entered.

Clearly, judging by the differing amounts of time taken, more checks are done in some cases than others. When my wife applied for Naturalisation 3 years ago neither of the referees were contacted, but that is not the same as saying that no checks were made on those referees.
John

SYH
BANNED
Posts: 2137
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: somewhere else now

Post by SYH » Mon May 21, 2007 11:48 am

Yeah I noticed the HMRC authorisation but even that has its limitation as it seems they are more interested if you paid taxes not your income.
NO I was hoping that maybe that guy who worked for them at one point could give us some helpful hints without breaching any confidentiality agreements as I am sure they probably asked him to sign.

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England
United Kingdom

Post by John » Mon May 21, 2007 2:11 pm

Yeah I noticed the HMRC authorisation but even that has its limitation as it seems they are more interested if you paid taxes not your income.
It would also permit BIA to get confirmation, for example, that the employer information is correct, and indeed the NINO is real and allocated to the applicant.
I was hoping that maybe that guy who worked for them at one point could give us some helpful hints without breaching any confidentiality agreements as I am sure they probably asked him to sign.
Undoubtedly anyone dealing with applications at BIA would have needed to sign the Official Secrets Act. The best hope you have is making a Freedom of Information Act request for unpublished guidance to be disclosed. But even then there are provisions in the FOI which might permit them a legitimate excuse for denying such a request.
John

maveli62
Junior Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 9:44 am

Post by maveli62 » Mon May 21, 2007 2:26 pm

maveli62 wrote:I think the person of professional standing may not be British Citizen anyone residing in UK is eligible. This was told by the Home Office staff and I know a person got naturalisation with a signature from a doctor who holds an Indian Passport holder
Any idea whether this is 100% true ? Or is it a case of which caseworker takes the application ?

Christophe
Diamond Member
Posts: 1204
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:54 pm

Post by Christophe » Mon May 21, 2007 5:59 pm

maveli62 wrote:
maveli62 wrote:I think the person of professional standing may not be British Citizen anyone residing in UK is eligible. This was told by the Home Office staff and I know a person got naturalisation with a signature from a doctor who holds an Indian Passport holder
Any idea whether this is 100% true ? Or is it a case of which caseworker takes the application ?
No, the referees for a naturalisation must be British citizens. For a passport application they may be either British or Irish citizens, I think. (All Commonwealth citizens used to be eligible to counter-sign a passport application, but not any more.)

Locked