D4109125 wrote:Sorry I only saw you saying they were minor. I failed to see the part where you said you were given them at court. If you were given them at court, then it is a conviction. You should be sure you were convicted (either by attending the court or pleading guilty in the post). If you have been guilty on an offence regardless of it's severity, it needs to be declared. Including the counterpart if clean is not relevant as you will be declaring it and 3 years has lapsed. I will be surprised if these are actually court issued it's more likely they are just regular FPNs in which case what I said above is correct. However, only you can answer that.
D4109125 - Thanks for your time thus far – Here’s the complete picture.
I had an opportunity to challenge this in court however never bothered. I pleaded guilty by post, was fined 60 pounds and 3 pts. on licences on both occasions. Paid both fines immediately.
To be clear and transparent the offences I am speaking about took place in 2006 and I was fined in 2007. No issues after that. Clean licences as both offences over 5yrs.
Court Fine imposed £60 on each occasion
Offence code SP30 and TS10 respectively
For informational purposes
SP30 Exceeding statutory speed limit on a public road.
TS10 Failing to comply with traffic light signals.
Are you saying the above is regarded as a CRIMINAL CONVICTION inline with the direct question asked by HO ? They did not ask for conviction they asked
Criminal Conviction ......Or do I add this to the other section for additional information which is my original plan with my counterpart licenses?
More importantly can this affect the outcome also considering they are spent?
Surely there must be forum members out there in the same position - If you are one your input will also be valuable.....Thanks