Hearing was today

[nagisons]

Hi everyone
I been to hearing toady. Homeoffice representative was absent. Judge proceed on behalf of home office. Judge asked me some basic questions. He just asked me the reason what happened at the time of application? why you missed the Current Appointment report?
I just replied misunderstood. Judge asked me for immigration history. What I did during PSW? What is the Nature of the degree and nature of business?
Is business active?

Judge will send verdict in next three weeks.

Judge said to me he is adding immigration act 8 to your case as well.


Anyone can judge the decision on the behalf of provided information.

I will appreciate your help.

Regards

[Olasunkanmi]

@ nagisons, when the judge ask why you didn't submit CAR at d time of application, you stated your answer as misunderstood. What exactly did you mean by misunderstand and did the judge ask you to explain that?
Did u also quote Evidential flexibility?

[khan_81]

Misunderstood?

Immigration Act 8?

[nagisons]

i replied to judge: i misunderstood "Company house incorporation certificate "and"Company house Current appointment report".

[smarty191]

What does section 8 says, anyone can explain plz??

Mate it seems that you will be ok. Tell us Where was you hearing??

[mszafar]

What does section 8 says, anyone can explain plz??

Mate it seems that you will be ok. Tell us Where was you hearing??

I think Section 8 is about Family and Private life in UK.

http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights ... -life.html

[sabuj263]

What does section 8 says, anyone can explain plz??

Mate it seems that you will be ok. Tell us Where was you hearing??

I think Section 8 is about Family and Private life in UK.

http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights ... -life.html

Article 8 is a human rights act. Google it, you will find more information.

http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/huma ... article-8/

[nagisons]

I had hearing at Taylor London.

[RizKCB]

You are lucky because HO rep was not there. In Tier1 Entp appeal, I have hardly heard about absence of HO rep.
If judge included article 8 himself then definitely he considered your immigration history and your previous progress as an immigrant on compassionate grounds. It is positive sign. It seems that judge decided in your favour and just to support his own arguments in your favour, he also included article 8 himself. It sounds to be in your favour because why would judge include article 8 himself to refuse you.