- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator
I don't agree. Those who were accepted into the programme only last year before the changes will feel no less betrayed if they fail to meet the points for FLR.SYH wrote:Pretty much the delay will make the issue moot.
The people most adversely affected were the initial HSMP applicants in 2002 when the programme was introduced.
Still, I am missing your point then. If an HSMP holder sold their house, moved their entire family and quite a very high paying job in their home country, then does it really matter when they were accepted as long as it was before Nov 2006. And, yes from a legal perspective.SYH wrote:London Blond I am talking about from a legal perpective of harm
Feelings, betrayals are personal to everyone and one is no greater than the other. In terms of success on points, you have to be strategic. If there is going to be a ruling in our favour, it isn't going to satisfy everyone affected
SYH wrote:You are talking about specific facts for a particular case
I am talking about classifications of groups.
The court can not consider each and every person's situation in a class action.
They are going to have to group together people in terms of how they are impacted in a meaningful and doable way.
They are unlikely to say the groups of people who sold their homes is one group and the group of people who gave up a a great career in the other.
They are more likely to group it in a way the 4 to 5 year year rule adversely impacts a person.
The criteria in judging people's renewal is another ball of wax and too complex to come up with a quick exampe as to how they might group people impacted and if the court is favorable HSMP applicants, they might tell HO to either scrap the new criteria and come up with another one. It is possible they might say reinstate the former criteria for those already in the system.
I hope you now see what I am getting at.
I agree with you, I don't think the court will divide (pre Nov 2006 HSMP) into groups and deliver ruling differently.LondonBlonde wrote:
Still don't agree that this issue will be moot soon. I think the courts will see all HSMP visas before Nov 2006 as the same. Not speaking about the 4-5 year rule.
LondonBlonde
Cheers, I found the DX website, and found the following quotes from their website:avjones wrote:Documents sent between solicitors and counsel almost certainly don't use the Royal Mail - our Chambers hardly uses post at all. We use the DX, a legal postal service, instead.
http://www.richardbuxton.co.uk/about/jreview.phpEdelweiss wrote:Does anyone know how long it will take - after the JR - to get a judgement?