Hearing

[Sai thriguna]

Hi,

My husband had an hearing yesterday and please find the below reasons for refusal.

Application was in house application with team partners with PSW route.
Funds partially from mother in law supported from back home
my husband and his team partner funds were in personal accounts only.
My husband got 8 points of refusal and his team partner only 3 points. Strange thing is it's the same case worker who handled our case but reasons were not equally given.

Refusal points

You have stated that you have access to at least 50,000 held in Third party funds and your own name to invest in business in the UK, as specified under provision (a) in the first row of Table 4 of Appendix A of the Immigration Rules. As evidence of this you have provided a letter from back home bank and statements from Team member.However, this evidence is not acceptable because it does not state your name and the name of your entrepreneur team partner and the bank statement from Team member bank has not been accompanied by a supporting letter fiom the bank to confirm their authenticity nor have you or your team partner signed the declaration from Mother in law bank to confirm funds.

The Team member bank, does not contain your name nor his contact landline or email and his declaration does not contain your signature and no letter has been included from a legal reptesentative to validate this declaration and vice versa.

Contracts are not original nor email ids, telephone numbers are not mentioned

My mother in law bank letter confirming funds which are available for both team members has not been validated by legal representative here in uk it seems.

Your team member is not named and no landline or email contact details are included for your clients.

The discussion was as follows
The HO barrister said that he had so many points that we could not go for evidence flexibility that was the reason was refusal.
Our barrister said that if that was the case why there were not given equal points was refusal when only one case worker was dealing with the case.
All the points was argued by our barrister but surprisingly HO barrister did not raised any questions nor the judge.
In fact judge was all ticking yes yes to the points.what does this mean.we are very much worried.what could be the result.please help us.
judge was also saying to our barrister that why are the Secretary of State making rules if the bank is not giving letters in the required format.
Judge said we will write within 10 days.

Please reply.

Thanks

[Davmck70]

Sorry to hear about what you are going through. The best is to wait patiently for the judge to respond after 10 days while praying and hoping for the best. There's always a chance you will succeed...