- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Bhote quoted that HO requested for the same third party letter initially submitted with the same procedure, this simply mean that HO want an updated copy of the third party bank letter. It doesn't say the applicant name should be on the letter as the judge already ruled that such letter is not possible as bank can't issue it. Its the same as those applicants that were asked to submit latest bank statement showing that 50k or 200k is still available to the applicant.[/quote]Olasunkanmi wrote:@ babylondoner,
What happens if bhote is unable to provide the letter with the missing information? Will he be refused again???? After a UK JUDGE has described their initial decision as unlawful ?
Its very straight forward. He provided bank letter with missing information. Home office should have asked him to provide proper letter without going for refusal and now judge asked them to act according to law so they are demanding letter so that can make decision for his applicatin which is still outstandingbabylondoner wrote:Olasunkanmi wrote:
Olasunkanmi, the problem here is not the availability of the 50k but the third party letter.
He was refused because of some missing information on the 3rd party letter which the bank refused to include.
He went to court and the judge agreed with his submissions.
HO asking again for the same letter is absolutely ridiculous.
What happens if bhote is unable to provide the letter with the missing information? Will he be refused again???? After a UK JUDGE has described their initial decision as unlawful ?
Congratulation and best of luck in your business.bhote123 wrote:I would like to thank you all for your valuable suggestions . Finally I received my visa on 31dec 2013. Thank you again .