- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2
Unfortunately, as you are unmarried, you do not satisfy the "meaning of parent"spike2009 wrote:I understand what your saying, and yes my name is on my childs birth cirtificate, but theyve refused my sons passport application when i applied in the normal way, because he was born in 2001 to unmarried parents therefore he takes the mothers nationality which is italian, ive been in the papers for this, im not making it up, see this link for the newspaper report http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ky ... ugJ__tFDcv that has all the information.
If his mother had ILR at the time of his birth, then he is automatically be British (1(1)(b )) otherwise than by descent. Else, he is entitled to register.If you were born in the UK or a qualifying territory wrote:If you were born in the United Kingdom between 2 October 2000 and 29 April 2006 to parents who were EEA citizens, you will not be a British citizen unless one of your parents had been given indefinite leave to remain before the date of your birth. However, you may be able to register as a British citizen if one of your parents later gets indefinite leave to remain (see Registering your child as a British citizen or subject).
The law is more complicated than you're setting out.njyildum1 wrote:Its quite unfortunate. I feel so sorry for you. This is ridiculous. It makes no sense whatsoever. But the Law also states that you are automatically British if either parent is British. So where is the confusion? Who is getting it wrong? Have you sort legal advice?
This is slightly incorrect. He can still apply using MN1 if applies under one of the sections covered by MN1 even if the child has been in the UK for more than 10 years.Just Wondering wrote: However, as you've stated, your child has been in the UK for 12 years and he has never left since birth. Therefore, MN1 is not appropriate as it only covers children who have been here under 10 years.
This child was born in the UK and has lived in the UK for 12 years since birth. MN1 is not the appropriate form.Registrations should be made using application form MN1, except for children...born in the United Kingdom who have lived there for at least the first 10 years of their life;
The text is slightly misleading. It should have saidJust Wondering wrote:It is not incorrect when read in the context of the matter at hand.
See page 4 http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitec ... de_mn1.pdf
See: http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/briti ... shcitizen/ which statesThis child was born in the UK and has lived in the UK for 12 years since birth. MN1 is not the appropriate form.Registrations should be made using application form MN1, except for children...born in the United Kingdom who have lived there for at least the first 10 years of their life;
It's not the child's residence that determines which application to use but the section under which the child is applying. Section 1(3), 3(1), 3(2), 3(5) should use MN1. Section 1(4) form T.Registrations should be made using application form MN1, except for children applying under section 1(4)...born in the United Kingdom who have lived there for at least the first 10 years of their life;