vv76 wrote:he showed 34800 as gross income and claimed 2500 expensed so he showed net income of 32300
he applied in sep 2010 for his t1g , only 4 months into 2010-2011 tax year so the account was not fully audited . he occured further expenses for the tax year so his final net income was 27600 .
when the accountant gave letter he mentioned the account was not fully audited . but in the forum few guys got refused for this discripencies.
do we are thinking of withdrawing the application incase it was refused with 10 year ban.
can anyone got a 10 year ban for tax deception , can you guys help please . we are desperate
Hi,
If he applied in September, that would have been 5-6 months into the tax year, depending on which date on September he applied.
Yes, it's entirely possible that further expenses were incurred during the rest of the tax year.
From what you wrote, the income remained the same but the expenses increased.
HMRC allows tax returns to be amended for both income and expenses.
The flexibility to amend a tax return is not limited to income. It extends to expenses as well.
The keyword being genuine and you have evidence of both.
Income you would have received in your bank, expenses you would have paid out of your bank.
On the basis that £34,800 was the final income declared on the last amended return ( as this was what was declared on the initial application ) and it was the genuine income which was received during the tax year and the additional £4,700 was genuine allowable expenses and your boyfriend has kept the records of these expenses, I can't see why you would have a problem.
I would add this; that I don't know how HO works so I can't comment on their decision.
