Hello:
I was making a formal complaint about UKBA in the first instance using the guidelines I provided to other forum members here previously -
http://www.immigrationboards.com/viewtopic.php?t=116167
1. Following the complaint, I waited 4 months - but made several phone/email requests for information when i did not receive any UKBA correspondence at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks or 16 weeks.
2. After 4 months, I made an appt with my MP who agreed with my chronological evidence of poor service levels and unsatisfactory response. His office wrote to the UKBA's MP Enquiry Team - who responded within 2 weeks with a vague and unhelpful answer to the MP (and subsequently to me)
3. I made another appt with my MP who agreed this was unsatisfactory and last week, spoke to the CEO of the UKBA in advance of bringing up the matter with the Immigration Minister (not about the case itself - that decision rests with the UKBA within the guidelines of law) but about the delay and poor service levels, and the effects on the applicants.
4. I heard from the UKBA the next day in a more satisfactory manner.
Whilst both my interventions with the UKBA do NOT refer to Citizenship applications in themselves, the process can be applied alternatively to waiting in distress indefinitely after a fair and reasonable time has elapsed (especially if there is a processing time standard set out).
NOTE: this has no impact on outcome of the case (that rests entirely on due application of law) but it does ensure 'lost cases' are treated as a matter of urgency.