I will surely suggest you pursue this. Teleperformance works with UKVI, and you provided them your documents, as you were adviced to do so, they are recommeded by UKVI, and they gave you full assurance that it will be sent.aanu0607 wrote:Obie wrote:All Nigerian, Pakistan and until recently Indian applications, I send directly to Sheffield with all supporting documents, except passport and the original of sponsor''s passport. Copies of all supporting documents are copied.
how do you advice us to proceeds??
It ought to be investigated as to whether it was sent to Sheffield, if it was not then why. The fact that you received all your documents again after the decision, indicates that it must have reached the desk of the decision maker, and he or she may well have just acted vindictively.
if my above analysis is correct, then it is wholly inappropriate for a new application to be made.
I find it most troubling the cases i read here. It seem a bit unreal at times.
These applications are very costly, and it is important that people are contacted. it is explicitly provided for in the rules, and people must not fear taking the ECO on in court, and making they pay for wasted cost. The tribunal procedure rules provides for appellant to make a claim for wasted or unreasonable cost.
