vinny wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2015 9:08 pm
The requirements of
319H(f)(i)-(iii) and
319J(e)(i)-(iii) are the same.
If your son’s extension with yours without his father was successful, then they have already accepted that he satisfies
319H(f). Why do you think that his ILR application under 319J with yours without their father would be unsuccessful?
Conversely, if 319J(e)(i)-(iii) fails, then why would 319H(f)(i)-(iii) succeed?
What evidence did you use for your son’s previous successful extension?
I think you and your son may
vary your pending extension applications to
ILR applications.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given
links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.