ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

5 years for ILR rule implemented

General UK immigration & work permits; don't post job search or family related topics!

Please use this section of the board if there is no specific section for your query.

Moderators: Casa, Amber, archigabe, batleykhan, ca.funke, ChetanOjha, EUsmileWEallsmile, JAJ, John, Obie, push, geriatrix, vinny, CR001, zimba, meself2, Administrator

Locked
timefactor
Member of Standing
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 11:46 am
Location: london-UK

Post by timefactor » Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:14 pm

just joked
tvt wrote:
timefactor wrote:ILR Team at HO would be facing redundancy now :lol: :lol: , as they don't have job for another year.
They will simply be seconded to deal with FLR(IED) extension applications instead of SET(O) forms. No one is going to be made redundant there.

FKarim
Newbie
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: London

Re: 4-5 ILR

Post by FKarim » Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:16 pm

gunslinger wrote: Why can't they use plain English to describe how HSMP & WP holders will be affected?
Why should they? That's where all the fun comes from :)

gunslinger
Newly Registered
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:30 pm
Location: East Sussex

FKarim

Post by gunslinger » Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:21 pm

Fkarim....you are right !

Maybe they think using legalese will scare the average immigrant into submission :?

zahidhsmp
Member
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:47 am
Location: London, UK

Post by zahidhsmp » Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:45 pm

Hi Guys
May be I get it wrong but I think they have mentioned that 4 years would be substituted by 5 where ever it is mentioned in the immigration rules.

Below is the whole press release:

Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules HC 1016 - March 2006

The Home Secretary has made the changes hereinafter stated in the Rules laid down by him as to the practice to be followed in the administration of the Immigration Act 1971 for regulating entry into and the stay of persons in the United Kingdom and contained in the Statement laid before Parliament on 23 May 1994 (HC 395), as amended. The amending statements were laid before, or presented to, Parliament on 20 September 1994 (Cmnd 2663), 26 October 1995 (HC 797), 4 January 1996 (Cmnd 3073), 7 March 1996 (HC 274), 2 April 1996 (HC 329), 30 August 1996 (Cmnd 3365), 31 October 1996 (HC 31), 27 February 1997 (HC 338), 29 May 1997 (Cmnd 3669), 5 June 1997 (HC 26), 30 July 1997 (HC 161), 11 May 1998 (Cmnd 3953), 8 October 1998 (Cmnd 4065), 18 November 1999 (HC 22), 28 July 2000 (HC 704), 20 September 2000 (Cmnd 4851), 27 August 2001 (Cmnd 5253), 16 April 2002 (HC 735), 27 August 2002 (Cmnd 5597), 7 November 2002 (HC 1301), 26 November 2002 (HC 104), 8 January 2003 (HC 180), 10 February 2003 (HC 389), 31 March 2003 (HC 538), 30 May 2003 (Cmnd 5829), 24 August 2003 (Cmnd 5949), 12 November 2003 (HC 1224), 17 December 2003 (HC 95), 12 January 2004 (HC 176), 26 February 2004 (HC 370), 31 March 2004 (HC 464), 29 April 2004 (HC 523), 3 August 2004 (Cmnd 6297), 24 September 2004 (Cmnd 6339), 18 October 2004 (HC 1112), 20 December 2004 (HC 164), 11 January 2005 (HC 194), 7 February 2005 (HC 302), 22 February 2005 (HC 346), 24 March 2005 (HC 486), 15 June 2005 (HC 104), 12 July 2005 (HC 299), 24 October 2005 (HC 582), 9 November 2005 (HC 645), 21 November 2005 (HC 697), 19 December 2005 (HC 769), 23 January 2006 (HC 819) and 1 March 2006 (HC 949).

These changes shall take effect on 3 April 2006.

1.In paragraph 6, after 'visa nationals', insert:

"Non-visa nationals" are persons who are not specified in Appendix 1 to these Rules".

2.For paragraph 60(i), substitute:

"(i) was last admitted to the UK in possession of a valid entry clearance in accordance with paragraphs 57-75M or 82-87F of these Rules, unless the applicant:

(a) was originally admitted to the UK with entry clearance in accordance with paragraphs 57-75M or 82-87F of these Rules which has since expired, but has subsequently been granted leave to remain in accordance with paragraphs 57-75M or 82-87F of these Rules; or

(b) is a non-visa national who has been accepted for a course of study at degree level or above, and who entered the UK with leave as a visitor in accordance with paragraphs 40-46F of these Rules on or before 1 July 2006; or

(c) is a non-visa national who has been accepted for a course of study at degree level or above, and who entered the UK with leave in accordance with the provisions of any category of these Rules, other than paragraphs 40-56J, 82-87, 104-121, and 135I-135N; or

(d) is a non-visa national who has been accepted for a course of study below degree level, and has valid leave in accordance with paragraphs 63-69, 69M-81, Part 2 (other than paragraphs 47-56J), or Parts 4-8 (other than paragraphs 104-121 and 135I-135N) of these Rules, which was granted on or before 22 July 2004; or

(e) is a non-visa national who has been accepted for a course of study below degree level, and has valid leave as a student to study below degree level in accordance with paragraphs 57-62 of these Rules, or has valid leave in accordance with paragraphs 69A-69L or 82-87F of these Rules, which was granted on or before 30 September 2004; and"

3.After paragraph 69P (iii), insert:

"(iii)(a) has leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as a work permit holder in accordance with paragraphs 128 to135 of these Rules; or".

4.For paragraphs 70 to 75, substitute:

"Requirements for leave to enter the United Kingdom as a postgraduate doctor or dentist

70.The requirements to be met by a person seeking leave to enter the UK as a postgraduate doctor or dentist are that the applicant:

(i) has successfully completed and obtained a recognised UK degree in medicine or dentistry from either:

(a) a UK publicly funded institution of further or higher education; or

(b) a UK bona fide private education institution which maintains satisfactory records of enrolment and attendance; and

(ii) has previously been granted leave:

(a) in accordance with paragraphs 57 to 69L of these Rules for the final academic year of the studies referred to in (i) above; and

(b) as a student under paragraphs 57 to 62 of these Rules for at least one other academic year (aside from the final year) of the studies referred to in (i) above; and

(iii) holds a letter from the Postgraduate Dean confirming he has a full-time place on a recognised Foundation Programme; and

(iv) intends to train full time in his post on the Foundation Programme; and

(v) is able to maintain and accommodate himself and any dependants without recourse to public funds; and

(vi) intends to leave the United Kingdom if, on expiry of his leave under this paragraph, he has not been granted leave to remain in the United Kingdom as:

(a) a doctor or dentist undertaking a period of clinical attachment or a dental observer post in accordance with paragraphs 75G to 75M of these Rules; or

(b) a work permit holder in accordance with paragraphs 128 to 135 of these Rules; or

(c) a highly skilled migrant in accordance with paragraphs 135A to 135H of these Rules; or

(d) a person intending to establish themselves in business in accordance with paragraphs 200 to 210 of these Rules; or

(e) an innovator in accordance with paragraphs 210A to 210H of these Rules; and

(vii) if his study at medical school or dental school, or any subsequent studies he has undertaken, were sponsored by a government or international scholarship agency, he has the written consent of his sponsor to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as a postgraduate doctor or dentist; and

(viii) if he has not previously been granted leave in this category, has completed his medical or dental degree
in the 12 months preceding this application; and

(ix) if he has previously been granted leave as a postgraduate doctor or dentist, is not seeking leave to enter to a date beyond 3 years from the date on which he was first granted leave to enter or remain in this
category; and

(x) holds a valid entry clearance for entry in this capacity except where he is a British National (Overseas),
a British overseas territories citizen, a British Overseas citizen, a British protected person or a person who under the British Nationality Act 1981 is a British subject.

Leave to enter as a postgraduate doctor or dentist

71.Leave to enter the United Kingdom as a postgraduate doctor or dentist may be granted for the duration of the Foundation Programme, for a period not exceeding 26 months, provided the Immigration Officer is satisfied that each of the requirements of paragraph 70 is met.

Refusal of leave to enter as a postgraduate doctor or dentist

72.Leave to enter as a postgraduate doctor or dentist is to be refused if the Immigration Officer is not satisfied that each of the requirements of paragraph 70 is met.

Requirements for an extension of stay as a postgraduate doctor or dentist

73.The requirements to be met by a person seeking an extension of stay as a postgraduate doctor or dentist
are that the applicant:

(i) meets the requirements of paragraph 70 (i) to (vii); and

(ii) has leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as either:

(a) a student in accordance with paragraphs 57 to 69L of these Rules; or

(b) a postgraduate doctor or dentist in accordance with paragraphs 70 to 75 of these Rules; or

(c) a doctor or dentist undertaking a period of clinical attachment or a dental observer post in accordance with paragraphs 75G to 75M of these Rules.

(iii) if he has not previously been granted leave in this category, has completed his medical or dental degree
in the last 12 months;

(iv) would not, as a result of an extension of stay, remain in the United Kingdom as a postgraduate doctor or dentist to a date beyond 3 years from the date on which he was first given leave to enter or remain in this capacity.

Extension of stay as a postgraduate doctor or dentist

74.An extension of stay as a postgraduate doctor or dentist may be granted for the duration of the Foundation
Programme, for a period not exceeding 3 years, provided the Secretary of State is satisfied that each of the
requirements of paragraph 73 is met.

Refusal of an extension of stay as a postgraduate doctor or dentist

75.An extension of stay as a postgraduate doctor or dentist is to be refused if the Secretary of State is not
satisfied that each of the requirements of paragraph 73 is met.".

5.After paragraph 75G (iv), insert:
"; and

(v) if he has previously been granted leave in this category, is not seeking leave to enter which, when
amalgamated with those previous periods of leave, would total more than 6 months."

6.In paragraph 75H, for "up to a maximum of 6 months", substitute "up to a maximum of 6 weeks at a time or 6 months in total in this category,".

7.After paragraph 75K(v), insert:
"; and

(vi) if he has previously been granted leave in this category, is not seeking an extension of stay which, when
amalgamated with those previous periods of leave, would total more than 6 months."

8.In paragraph 75L, after "may be granted an extension of stay for the period of their clinical attachment or dental observer post", insert "up to a maximum of 6 weeks at a time or 6 months in total in this category,".

9.For paragraph 135O (i), substitute:

"(i) has successfully completed and obtained either:

(a) a UK recognised degree (with second class honours or above), Master?s degree or PhD in a subject approved by the Department for Education and Skills for the purposes of this scheme at either:

(i) a publicly funded institution of further or higher education; or

(ii) a bona fide private education institution which maintains satisfactory records of enrolment and
attendance; or

(b) a UK recognised Master?s degree or PhD in any subject, where study for this qualification commenced on or after 1 May 2006, at an institution which is on the Department for Education and Skills' Register of Education and Training Providers, and is either:

(i) a publicly funded institution of further or higher education; or

(ii) a bona fide private education institution which maintains satisfactory records of enrolment and
attendance; and"

10.After paragraph 206G, insert:

"206H.The requirements for an extension of stay as a person intending to establish himself in business in the
United Kingdom for a Postgraduate Doctor or Dentist are that the applicant:

(i) entered the United Kingdom or was given leave to remain as a Postgraduate Doctor or Dentist in

accordance with paragraphs 70 to 75 of these Rules; and
(ii) has the written consent of his official sponsor to such self employment if he is a member of a government or international scholarship agency sponsorship and that sponsorship is either ongoing or has recently come to an end at the time of the requested extension; and

(iii) meets each of the requirements of paragraph 201 (i) - (x)."

11.In paragraphs 207 and 208, for ?or 206G? substitute "206G, or 206H".

12.In paragraphs 134(i), 142 (i), 150(i), 158(i), 159G(i), 167(i), 176(i), 184(i), 187, 190, 192(ii), 209(i), 222(i)
and (ii), 230(i), 238(i), 264, 267, 269(i), 255, 255A, and 255B for "4 years? (wherever appearing), substitute
"5 years".


13.For paragraph 134(ii), substitute:

"(ii) he has met the requirements of paragraph 128(i) to (v) throughout the 5 year period; and".

14.In paragraphs 135B, 137, 145, 162, 171, 179, 204, 215, 225, and 233 for "12 months", substitute "2 years".

15.For paragraph 135G(i), substitute:

"(i) he has spent a continuous period of 5 years in the United Kingdom in this capacity, or has had a continuous period of at least 5 years? leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom which is made up of periods of leave granted as a highly skilled migrant in accordance with paragraphs 135A to 135F of these Rules, as work permit holder under paragraphs 128 to 134 of these Rules, or as an Innovator under paragraphs 210A to 210H of these Rules; and"

16.In paragraphs 142(ii), 150(ii), 158(ii), 159G(ii), 167(ii), 176(ii), 184(ii), 209(ii), 210G(ii), 230(ii), 238(ii), 269(ii), 255A and 255B for "4 year", substitute "5 year".

17.In paragraphs 156 and 159E, after "not exceeding 12 months", insert "at a time".

18.In paragraph 174B, for "12 months", substitute "3 years at a time".

19.In paragraph 207, after "not exceeding 3 years", insert "at a time".

20.For paragraphs 209(iii) and 222(iii), substitute:
"(iii) submits audited accounts for the first 4 years of trading and management accounts for the 5th year.".

21.In paragraph 210B, for "18 months", substitute "2 years".

22.In paragraph 210E, for "30 months", substitute "3 years at a time".

23.In paragraph 210G(i), for "4 years leave", substitute "5 years".

24.In paragraph 228, delete the word "maximum", and after "period", insert "not exceeding 3 years at a time".

25.In paragraph 284(i), after 'fiancé' insert 'or proposed civil partner'.


Regards

zahidhsmp
Member
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:47 am
Location: London, UK

Post by zahidhsmp » Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:58 pm

sorry, forgot to put the link initially that is

http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/en ... ges22.html

Regards

aj77
Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:37 pm
Contact:

Post by aj77 » Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:24 pm

There isn t a big difference of changes in immigration rules HC 1016 which has been issued today and the one which was issued on 13th of March 2006.
Then why HSMP replied to 5 HSMP applicants in different emails on different days that they will not be affected?

You can make mistake once, twice, thrice but can t do it continuously considering today was last working day before the new changes will be implemented.

Email should be considered as Authentic as it was being sent by HSMP team not by any individual.

Any comments?

supertiger
Member
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:14 pm

Post by supertiger » Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:45 pm

I believe everyone is confused now we are really already indifferent to see any emails like below I just got:

WPCustomers <wpcustomers@ind.homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>
Sent : 31 March 2006 16:47:07
Subject : RE: ILR confusion

| | | Inbox


Dear XXX,

Thank you for your email.

The e-mail from the HSMP team says that 'current visa holders will not be
affected'.

This means that if an individual has already been granted the first year
visa,( which up to now has been the rule for HSMP), they will still apply
for the 3 year extension, as before, but then a further year will be needed
because, after 3rd April 2006, all Overseas Nationals, whether they hold a
Work Permit or a Highly Skilled Migrants Visa, will need to show evidence
that they have ALREADY worked in the UK for FIVE YEARS.

I hope this clarifies the situation.

Regards,

Sarah Oxley
Customer Services Advisor

Customer Contact Centre
Work Permits (UK)
Home Office
PO Box 3468
Sheffield
S3 8WA

timefactor
Member of Standing
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 11:46 am
Location: london-UK

Post by timefactor » Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:33 pm

biggest joke :lol: :lol: :lol:
supertiger wrote:
I hope this clarifies the situation.

Regards,

Sarah Oxley
Customer Services Advisor

Customer Contact Centre
Work Permits (UK)
Home Office
PO Box 3468
Sheffield
S3 8WA

aj77
Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:37 pm
Contact:

Post by aj77 » Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:41 pm

I think a kid can understand what they were asking in emails that either they can apply for ILR after 4 years or due to these changes they will also suffer like others and will have to get another years Visa before applying for ILR.
And if you get the reply that you wont be affected it clearly means that you can apply for ILR after completing your 4 years being committed to you and you wont suffer with these changes.

Now they are defining their replies according to their own idiot minds.

Anyway keep these email safe guys and we ll see how judges understand by these replies.

sowhat
Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:57 pm

Post by sowhat » Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:42 am

supertiger wrote:I believe everyone is confused now we are really already indifferent to see any emails like below I just got:

WPCustomers <wpcustomers@ind.homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>
Sent : 31 March 2006 16:47:07
Subject : RE: ILR confusion

| | | Inbox


Dear XXX,

Thank you for your email.

The e-mail from the HSMP team says that 'current visa holders will not be
affected'.

This means that if an individual has already been granted the first year
visa,( which up to now has been the rule for HSMP), they will still apply
for the 3 year extension, as before, but then a further year will be needed
because, after 3rd April 2006, all Overseas Nationals, whether they hold a
Work Permit or a Highly Skilled Migrants Visa, will need to show evidence
that they have ALREADY worked in the UK for FIVE YEARS.

I hope this clarifies the situation.

Regards,

Sarah Oxley
Customer Services Advisor

Customer Contact Centre
Work Permits (UK)
Home Office
PO Box 3468
Sheffield
S3 8WA
but in the email I have received was explicitly said that I can apply for ILR after 4 years.

aj77
Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:37 pm
Contact:

Post by aj77 » Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:20 am

if anybody could see carefully about those emails received by HSMP applicants,one can find out that the email sent directly to HSMP team and asked specially about HSMP programme changes.

HSMP team replied that HSMP applicant wont be affected.
On the other side the emails sent at this address,

WPCustomers <wpcustomers@ind.homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>

email was being replied not by HSMP team but it s written
Managed Migration

and now the lady who interpreted the definition of "Existing Visa holders wont be affected",(email reply received by HSMP applicant from HSMP team) also not from HSMP team but customer Contact Centre,Work Permits, UK.

This point is also considerable that HSMP applicant gave a written Affidavit that he will make UK as home Country at the end of qualifying period,
while Work Permit holders don t need that affidavit to submit.

Government made a special committment to HSMP applicant that furture changes wont affect him while no such Assurance has been given by the government to work permit holder.

We can say that ILR and it s timing is Part of HSMP and has been committed

while ILR is not compulsory part of work permit programme

In both changes of Immigration rules issued in the month of March, 2006 they also mentioned that to qualify for ILR ,work Permit holder need to submit document showing that his services still need UK while for HSMP applicant it is not compulsory to add that document showing that his services still required by UK.

It looks like that replies sent to HSMP applicant by HSMP team was not by error or ignorance but they really mean it.

sowhat
Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:57 pm

Post by sowhat » Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:53 am

so what's your point?

easylife4me
Junior Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:09 am
Contact:

Post by easylife4me » Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:26 am

well just been to homeoffice website. if you look at the news and press release. it clearly says that work permit is 4 years ILR and for HSMP is 5 years.

http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/en ... rules.html
THANKS

sowhat
Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:57 pm

Post by sowhat » Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:33 am

easylife4me wrote:well just been to homeoffice website. if you look at the news and press release. it clearly says that work permit is 4 years ILR and for HSMP is 5 years.

http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/en ... rules.html
12.In paragraphs 134(i), 142 (i), 150(i), 158(i), 159G(i), 167(i), 176(i), 184(i), 187, 190, 192(ii), 209(i), 222(i)
and (ii), 230(i), 238(i), 264, 267, 269(i), 255, 255A, and 255B for "4 years? (wherever appearing), substitute
"5 years".

easylife4me
Junior Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:09 am
Contact:

Post by easylife4me » Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:43 am

so what..


what u trying to say
THANKS

aj77
Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:37 pm
Contact:

Post by aj77 » Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:48 am

we can see the difference between what has been published in News section of HO website which was being mentioned by easylife4me

and in this link

http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/en ... ges22.html

which was mentioned by Zahidhsmp

and has been bissued by Home sectretary of Immigration Department.

But error is possible in news section area but statement issued by Home Secretary look more authentic

And soon we might see the correction in News area too as there are some other mistakes too in it like entery clearance for 12 months for hsmp etc
Last edited by aj77 on Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

aj77
Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:37 pm
Contact:

Post by aj77 » Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:00 pm

sowhat wrote

so what's your point?

It looks like they might treat work visa holders and hsmp applicants differently considering hsmp applicants in immigration catagory as this programme has been designed after studying Canada,Australia and Newzealand immigration policies

.Just a guess considering their replies sent to hsmp applicant and some other points I mentioned earliar.

sowhat
Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:57 pm

Post by sowhat » Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:18 pm

aj77 wrote:sowhat wrote

so what's your point?

It looks like they might treat work visa holders and hsmp applicants differently considering hsmp applicants in immigration catagory as this programme has been designed after studying Canada,Australia and Newzealand immigration policies

.Just a guess considering their replies sent to hsmp applicant and some other points I mentioned earliar.
I see. But the do not have this "immigration category" and HSMP is quilified as work-related.
easylife4me wrote:
so what..
what u trying to say
if you look here:
134. Indefinite leave to remain may be granted, on application, to a person admitted as a work permit holder provided:

(i) he has spent a continuous period of 4 years in the United Kingdom in this capacity; and
and here
12.In paragraphs 134(i), 142 (i), 150(i), 158(i), 159G(i), 167(i), 176(i), 184(i), 187, 190, 192(ii), 209(i), 222(i)
and (ii), 230(i), 238(i), 264, 267, 269(i), 255, 255A, and 255B for "4 years? (wherever appearing), substitute
"5 years"
.
meaning that for HSMP they made the change in the text but for WP they put it in a note...

supertiger
Member
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:14 pm

Post by supertiger » Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:36 pm

Don;t know if it is a delibrate trick that they put in one place that HSMP will not be affected and in another place they said wp is 4 years to divert our concentration and devide our unity.... but one thing is very clear is that they are very determined to apply to all of us althought constantly "typing mistakes" here and there and they can always remedy with obsurd interpretations. therefore arguing with them is one side and speed up our legal action is MUST now. we cannot just hang around with this sort of information everyday jeopadise our own nerves... btw IND web is working now. It seems that soon a congestion charge will apply to all UK working time access: if you wish to get premier information please pay XXX. Happy April Fool's day!

sowhat
Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:57 pm

Post by sowhat » Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:45 pm

supertiger wrote:Don;t know if it is a delibrate trick that they put in one place that HSMP will not be affected and in another place they said wp is 4 years to divert our concentration and devide our unity.... but one thing is very clear is that they are very determined to apply to all of us althought constantly "typing mistakes" here and there and they can always remedy with obsurd interpretations. therefore arguing with them is one side and speed up our legal action is MUST now. we cannot just hang around with this sort of information everyday jeopadise our own nerves... btw IND web is working now. It seems that soon a congestion charge will apply to all UK working time access: if you wish to get premier information please pay XXX. Happy April Fool's day!
I do not think that it is a deliberate trick... they just need more skilled migrants to do a good job :)

easylife4me
Junior Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:09 am
Contact:

Post by easylife4me » Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:46 pm

after going through the home office website what i can make out is ... they are having different ILR rules for WP and HSMP.
for WP-4 years
for HSMP-5 years
THANKS

timefactor
Member of Standing
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 11:46 am
Location: london-UK

Post by timefactor » Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:05 pm

IMHO, it's typo/careless attitude. It meant to be 5 years and not *4* years for all work related categories. We need to be more focussed on the point what we have seen on 13-March-2006.

easylife4me
Junior Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:09 am
Contact:

Post by easylife4me » Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:11 pm

i think its important to see the press release they have for 31st.
they have must think about the rule and make the necessary changes.
i recon 31st release is not a mistake or type error
THANKS

aj77
Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:37 pm
Contact:

Post by aj77 » Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:14 pm

Can anybody find out changes in immigration rules 2002 in New Zealand alongwith Court Decision and it s proceedings which were being challenged in the court and consultants won that case.Details of that case could proove useful for solicitors and for us to know the success of any legal action taken against these changes.

sowhat
Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:57 pm

Post by sowhat » Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:26 pm

easylife4me wrote:after going through the home office website what i can make out is ... they are having different ILR rules for WP and HSMP.
for WP-4 years
for HSMP-5 years
where did you find 4 years for WP?

Locked