- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Hi thanks for your quick answer, that's very unfortunate...D4109125 wrote:Yes you should have waited. If you are refused ask for a reconsideration (£80) stating that the conviction has now lapsed. However, they should, ideally, use their discretion and allow the application as at the time of decision the conviction will have lapsed. I assume you declared it.
I assume this was a PND, if so, as long as you have no more than one in the 12 months preceding your application, you should be ok. There should be no need to declare a single PND.jah79 wrote:Say one had a run-in with the law in the last 12 months while on a night out and one was deemed to be too "tired" to walk on the street and cordially invited to spend an evening in a concrete room to "sleep it off", would this be an obstacle even if one was told the next day that after payment of a fine this was not a recordable offence and does not need to be declared?
Interesting... There is no harm in tryingD4109125 wrote:Indeed, the Cumulative effect could consider for example, where an applicant has admitted to numerous offences and asked the Court to consider all the admissions during sentencing. The higher the number of offences the more likely it is the application will be refused even where 3 years has lapsed.
It was in an acrimonious marriage - domestic issueD4109125 wrote:It would be unlikely that your conviction on it's own would be grounds for refusal after it has lapsed so long as the other aspects of your application were without issue. If for example, there were aggravating factors, e.g. the assault was against a vulnerable individual, that could be a different story.
Vulnerable adult wrote:A vulnerable adult is someone aged 18 or over:
Who is, or may be, in need of community services due to age, illness or a mental or physical disability
Who is, or may be, unable to take cae of himself/herself, or unable to protect himself/herself against significant harm or exploitation
(Definition from the Department of Health 2002)
It was my ex and she not vulnerableD4109125 wrote:I was thinking a child or vulnerable adult:
Vulnerable adult wrote:A vulnerable adult is someone aged 18 or over:
Who is, or may be, in need of community services due to age, illness or a mental or physical disability
Who is, or may be, unable to take cae of himself/herself, or unable to protect himself/herself against significant harm or exploitation
(Definition from the Department of Health 2002)
Just saw this. Good change!D4109125 wrote:I recommended some changes regarding criminality i.e. that the form did not ask the applicant about cautions even though these would be a bar for 3 years and if not declared could be considered deception and a 10 year ban and also some changes regarding sexual offences. To my shock they have changed the new form (click) [section 3].