- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
It's a grey area; for instance, when you apply for a passport, they have the same list of professionals and they specify that the person can be retired (and must have known you for 2 years); in case of BC application, they must have known you for 3 years and it doesn't say if they can be retired or not; my guess is that if you use a retired person, they are probably not going to check, but if they do check and find out, it's not clear if they will accept this person or not; so basically, it's riskier than using someone still working, but not a huge risk, because they might not even check and if they do, they might still accept it and if they don't accept them, they normally ask you for another Referee; so I'd say the risk of refusal is low.neoseal wrote:I doubt, as retired, the professional registration may have lapsed, however that doesn't mean that she will not be called a nurse. Bit of grey area.
Ask if the registration is valid.
Looking at the list, seems like person has to be working.
Find someone else to be on safe side.
It's a grey area; for instance, when you apply for a passport, they have the same list of professionals and they specify that the person can be retired (and must have known you for 2 years); in case of BC application, they must have known you for 3 years and it doesn't say if they can be retired or not; my guess is that if you use a retired person, they are probably not going to check, but if they do check and find out, it's not clear if they will accept this person or not; so basically, it's riskier than using someone still working, but not a huge risk, because they might not even check and if they do, they might still accept it and if they don't accept them, they normally ask you for another Referee; so I'd say the risk of refusal is low.neoseal wrote:I doubt, as retired, the professional registration may have lapsed, however that doesn't mean that she will not be called a nurse. Bit of grey area.
Ask if the registration is valid.
Looking at the list, seems like person has to be working.
Find someone else to be on safe side.
Ah good. At least I can use the retired nurse as a referee for my passport!Derivaz wrote: It's a grey area; for instance, when you apply for a passport, they have the same list of professionals and they specify that the person can be retired (and must have known you for 2 years); in case of BC application, they must have known you for 3 years and it doesn't say if they can be retired or not; my guess is that if you use a retired person, they are probably not going to check, but if they do check and find out, it's not clear if they will accept this person or not; so basically, it's riskier than using someone still working, but not a huge risk, because they might not even check and if they do, they might still accept it and if they don't accept them, they normally ask you for another Referee; so I'd say the risk of refusal is low.
The guide is not clear about retired people; the passport rules indicate that you can use a retired person, but the BC one doesn't say anything; so it's not clear, what I'd do is: If you can use another referee, use it, if you don't have anyone else, use this one, if they don't accept it, i think they'll ask you for another one.felix2005 wrote:Hi there, just wonder if someone knows the answer.
Can a retired sergeant from the army be considered as a referee with a professional standing?
thank you
Joanna
Hi Joanna,felix2005 wrote:Hi there, just wonder if someone knows the answer.
Can a retired sergeant from the army be considered as a referee with a professional standing?
thank you
Joanna
I can't see it listed in the UKBA guide but then again it is meant to be a sort of sample and not an exhaustive list.luk1c wrote:Hi, can I use HR officer in limited company as my professional referee?
I'd say that HRand Personnel officer are the same thing; so if the company they work for is VAT registered or Limited company; I think it's a valid referee; I'd ask them to write down "personnel officer" as profession.luk1c wrote:But you can see personnel officer! Is the same like HR
But everyone know HR is the same think as personnel officer!Derivaz wrote:I'd say that HRand Personnel officer are the same thing; so if the company they work for is VAT registered or Limited company; I think it's a valid referee; I'd ask them to write down "personnel officer" as profession.luk1c wrote:But you can see personnel officer! Is the same like HR
Regarding retired referees; they say "active or retired" for one of the professions, so I guess the rest of the referees have to be active....
Have you tried emailing the HO? they'll probably give you some vague answer that won't clarify it, but you never know, they might give you a straight answer for a change
So its fine HR referee?neoseal wrote:Once upon a time there use to be "Industrial Welfare" department then it was called "Personnel Department". Then some new management graduates came and said that we don't like "personnel" name and will we call it "Human Resources" so came in new name for that department, though the job and roles and responsibilities remained the same, i.e to convert "Human Resources" to "Human Remains".
I think it is, everyone thinks that HR and Personnel are the same thing, so I'd use that ref; although, one has to bear in mind that you are never 100% sure with the HO, they create vague laws intentionally to give themselves room for interpretation and make it difficult for anyone to complain against them.....luk1c wrote:So its fine HR referee?neoseal wrote:Once upon a time there use to be "Industrial Welfare" department then it was called "Personnel Department". Then some new management graduates came and said that we don't like "personnel" name and will we call it "Human Resources" so came in new name for that department, though the job and roles and responsibilities remained the same, i.e to convert "Human Resources" to "Human Remains".