I plan to wait for the March hearing and if it is not in the publics favour, i will withdraw my application and reapply. I'll double check everything via this forum, as u lot have been a bigger help to me than some of these so called " solicitors" and " immigration specialists".tallojani wrote:ALWAYSHOPE wrote:To Sameena
Your solicitor has not given you good advice. You should have sent a letter saying that you have already submitted the documents and if you had missed any out, should have explained reasons why.
To Sameena,
King2be is right, when the new rule came into implementation it was clear that 6 months bank statements and 6 months payslips were required, still you only sent 14 and kept hoping it will be fine. It turned out it wasn't fine and you ended up sending more evidence post your application date whereas one would say BHC might have been interested in seeing evidence pre application date (6 months upto application date). But again, it makes sense to send fresh evidence relating to your current situation which you were advised by the solicitors and you did so. Who knows what is right or wrong, in your case not even the solicitor.
King2be
To some extent I do agree with you on the fact that knowing BHC has strict rules we still end up making a mistake in our application and blame BHC for taking too long and when we are asked for additional documents we get shocked why we. If all our documents are fine, meet the requirements and we don't chase BHC than this could make the process quicker for us all but no we are impatient and end up bombarding BHC with emails.
You are right this forum is for timeline and to help people understand the process, but you could have said that in a nice manner.
Everything i submitted was checked through by a specialist, that's what ticks me off the most.